APH vs. BDC
APH (Amphenol Corporation) and BDC (Belden Inc.) are both stocks. APH operates in Electronic Components (Technology), while BDC operates in Electrical Equipment & Parts (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, APH returned 29.01%/yr vs 7.72%/yr for BDC. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
APH vs. BDC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, APH achieves a 23.05% return, which is significantly higher than BDC's 4.46% return. Over the past 10 years, APH has outperformed BDC with an annualized return of 29.01%, while BDC has yielded a comparatively lower 7.72% annualized return.
APH
- 1D
- 1.22%
- 1M
- 25.67%
- YTD
- 23.05%
- 6M
- 23.05%
- 1Y
- 77.83%
- 3Y*
- 61.78%
- 5Y*
- 38.82%
- 10Y*
- 29.01%
BDC
- 1D
- -1.31%
- 1M
- 14.78%
- YTD
- 4.46%
- 6M
- 2.24%
- 1Y
- 10.94%
- 3Y*
- 10.43%
- 5Y*
- 19.54%
- 10Y*
- 7.72%
APH vs. BDC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APH Amphenol Corporation | 23.05% | 96.08% | 41.30% | 31.85% | -11.96% | 35.25% | 22.09% | 34.91% | -6.82% | 31.81% |
BDC Belden Inc. | 4.46% | 3.68% | 46.06% | 7.69% | 9.75% | 57.46% | -23.40% | 32.14% | -45.70% | 3.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between APH and BDC is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 1993 | 0.44 |
The correlation between APH and BDC shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (1 year) to 0.61 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
APH:
$214.04B
BDC:
$4.79B
APH:
$4.58
BDC:
$5.94
APH:
36.20
BDC:
20.49
APH:
1.20
BDC:
0.25
APH:
8.22
BDC:
1.74
APH:
15.31
BDC:
3.74
APH:
$25.90B
BDC:
$2.79B
APH:
$9.67B
BDC:
$1.04B
APH:
$7.45B
BDC:
$427.27M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
APH vs. BDC — Risk / Return Rank
APH
BDC
APH vs. BDC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amphenol Corporation (APH) and Belden Inc. (BDC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| APH | BDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.08 | +0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.78 | 0.34 | +2.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.15 | 0.73 | +6.41 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
APH vs. BDC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum APH drawdown since its inception was -63.41%, smaller than the maximum BDC drawdown of -85.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APH and BDC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| APH | BDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.41% | -85.69% | +22.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.19% | -32.41% | +4.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.19% | -36.62% | +8.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.73% | -36.62% | +7.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.56% | -67.69% | +30.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -19.32% | +19.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.55% | -34.80% | +21.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.93% | 14.99% | -4.06% |
Volatility
APH vs. BDC - Volatility Comparison
Amphenol Corporation (APH) has a higher volatility of 13.67% compared to Belden Inc. (BDC) at 12.34%. This indicates that APH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BDC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| APH | BDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.67% | 12.34% | +1.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.74% | 29.62% | +7.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.80% | 36.56% | +5.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.80% | 36.73% | -5.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.97% | 40.28% | -12.31% |
Dividends
APH vs. BDC - Dividend Comparison
APH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.40%, more than BDC's 0.16% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APH Amphenol Corporation | 0.40% | 0.55% | 0.79% | 1.07% | 1.06% | 0.89% | 0.80% | 0.89% | 1.09% | 0.80% | 0.86% | 1.01% |
BDC Belden Inc. | 0.16% | 0.17% | 0.18% | 0.26% | 0.28% | 0.30% | 0.48% | 0.36% | 0.48% | 0.26% | 0.27% | 0.42% |
Financials
APH vs. BDC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Amphenol Corporation and Belden Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
APH vs. BDC - Profitability Comparison
APH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amphenol Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.80B and revenue of 7.62B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.8%.
BDC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Belden Inc. reported a gross profit of 258.09M and revenue of 696.38M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.1%.
APH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amphenol Corporation reported an operating income of 1.83B and revenue of 7.62B, resulting in an operating margin of 24.0%.
BDC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Belden Inc. reported an operating income of 77.96M and revenue of 696.38M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.2%.
APH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amphenol Corporation reported a net income of 2.35B and revenue of 7.62B, resulting in a net margin of 30.8%.
BDC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Belden Inc. reported a net income of 51.03M and revenue of 696.38M, resulting in a net margin of 7.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
APH and BDC have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
APH has higher volatility (13.67%) compared to BDC (12.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, APH dropped -63.41% vs BDC's -85.69%.
APH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for APH and BDC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer