PortfoliosLab logo
APC.DE vs. ABEA.DE
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between APC.DE and ABEA.DE is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

APC.DE vs. ABEA.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Apple Inc (APC.DE) and Alphabet Inc Class A (ABEA.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

10,000.00%20,000.00%30,000.00%40,000.00%50,000.00%60,000.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
43,927.35%
6,010.35%
APC.DE
ABEA.DE

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

APC.DE:

0.14

ABEA.DE:

-0.43

Sortino Ratio

APC.DE:

0.35

ABEA.DE:

-0.39

Omega Ratio

APC.DE:

1.05

ABEA.DE:

0.95

Calmar Ratio

APC.DE:

0.11

ABEA.DE:

-0.37

Martin Ratio

APC.DE:

0.33

ABEA.DE:

-0.84

Ulcer Index

APC.DE:

10.85%

ABEA.DE:

14.86%

Daily Std Dev

APC.DE:

29.79%

ABEA.DE:

29.99%

Max Drawdown

APC.DE:

-83.56%

ABEA.DE:

-60.31%

Current Drawdown

APC.DE:

-28.15%

ABEA.DE:

-30.71%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

APC.DE:

€2.64T

ABEA.DE:

€1.77T

EPS

APC.DE:

€5.68

ABEA.DE:

€7.94

PE Ratio

APC.DE:

30.95

ABEA.DE:

18.21

PEG Ratio

APC.DE:

2.01

ABEA.DE:

0.97

PS Ratio

APC.DE:

6.59

ABEA.DE:

4.94

PB Ratio

APC.DE:

45.67

ABEA.DE:

5.75

Total Revenue (TTM)

APC.DE:

€400.37B

ABEA.DE:

€359.71B

Gross Profit (TTM)

APC.DE:

€186.70B

ABEA.DE:

€210.76B

EBITDA (TTM)

APC.DE:

€138.87B

ABEA.DE:

€149.88B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, APC.DE achieves a -27.30% return, which is significantly lower than ABEA.DE's -24.84% return. Over the past 10 years, APC.DE has outperformed ABEA.DE with an annualized return of 21.30%, while ABEA.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 18.69% annualized return.


APC.DE

YTD

-27.30%

1M

3.89%

6M

-16.09%

1Y

4.15%

5Y*

20.47%

10Y*

21.30%

ABEA.DE

YTD

-24.84%

1M

-0.32%

6M

-17.54%

1Y

-12.97%

5Y*

16.42%

10Y*

18.69%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

APC.DE vs. ABEA.DE — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

APC.DE
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of APC.DE is 5353
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of APC.DE is 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of APC.DE is 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of APC.DE is 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of APC.DE is 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of APC.DE is 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

ABEA.DE
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ABEA.DE is 2929
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ABEA.DE is 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ABEA.DE is 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ABEA.DE is 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ABEA.DE is 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ABEA.DE is 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

APC.DE vs. ABEA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Apple Inc (APC.DE) and Alphabet Inc Class A (ABEA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current APC.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.14, which is higher than the ABEA.DE Sharpe Ratio of -0.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of APC.DE and ABEA.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.50December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
0.29
-0.30
APC.DE
ABEA.DE

Dividends

APC.DE vs. ABEA.DE - Dividend Comparison

APC.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.47%, less than ABEA.DE's 0.54% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
APC.DE
Apple Inc
0.47%0.34%0.58%0.64%0.41%0.57%0.93%1.56%1.37%1.60%1.64%1.32%
ABEA.DE
Alphabet Inc Class A
0.54%0.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

APC.DE vs. ABEA.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APC.DE drawdown since its inception was -83.56%, which is greater than ABEA.DE's maximum drawdown of -60.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APC.DE and ABEA.DE. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-35.00%-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-22.47%
-25.04%
APC.DE
ABEA.DE

Volatility

APC.DE vs. ABEA.DE - Volatility Comparison

Apple Inc (APC.DE) and Alphabet Inc Class A (ABEA.DE) have volatilities of 15.35% and 15.19%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
15.35%
15.19%
APC.DE
ABEA.DE

Financials

APC.DE vs. ABEA.DE - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Apple Inc and Alphabet Inc Class A. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


40.00B60.00B80.00B100.00B120.00B20212022202320242025
95.36B
90.23B
(APC.DE) Total Revenue
(ABEA.DE) Total Revenue
Values in EUR except per share items

APC.DE vs. ABEA.DE - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Apple Inc and Alphabet Inc Class A over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%45.0%50.0%55.0%60.0%20212022202320242025
47.1%
59.7%
(APC.DE) Gross Margin
(ABEA.DE) Gross Margin
APC.DE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Apple Inc reported a gross profit of 44.87B and revenue of 95.36B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 47.1%.

ABEA.DE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Alphabet Inc Class A reported a gross profit of 53.87B and revenue of 90.23B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.7%.

APC.DE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Apple Inc reported an operating income of 29.59B and revenue of 95.36B, resulting in an operating margin of 31.0%.

ABEA.DE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Alphabet Inc Class A reported an operating income of 30.61B and revenue of 90.23B, resulting in an operating margin of 33.9%.

APC.DE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Apple Inc reported a net income of 24.78B and revenue of 95.36B, resulting in a net margin of 26.0%.

ABEA.DE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Alphabet Inc Class A reported a net income of 34.54B and revenue of 90.23B, resulting in a net margin of 38.3%.