PortfoliosLab logo
APAM vs. EFC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between APAM and EFC is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

APAM vs. EFC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Artisan Partners Asset Management Inc. (APAM) and Ellington Financial Inc. (EFC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

APAM:

0.02

EFC:

0.85

Sortino Ratio

APAM:

0.18

EFC:

1.40

Omega Ratio

APAM:

1.02

EFC:

1.20

Calmar Ratio

APAM:

-0.04

EFC:

1.03

Martin Ratio

APAM:

-0.10

EFC:

3.36

Ulcer Index

APAM:

11.08%

EFC:

5.81%

Daily Std Dev

APAM:

32.49%

EFC:

21.53%

Max Drawdown

APAM:

-59.70%

EFC:

-79.08%

Current Drawdown

APAM:

-14.04%

EFC:

-9.75%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

APAM:

$2.87B

EFC:

$1.21B

EPS

APAM:

$3.64

EFC:

$1.39

PE Ratio

APAM:

11.19

EFC:

9.23

PEG Ratio

APAM:

1.38

EFC:

0.86

PS Ratio

APAM:

2.56

EFC:

3.93

PB Ratio

APAM:

8.04

EFC:

0.95

Total Revenue (TTM)

APAM:

$1.14B

EFC:

$284.66M

Gross Profit (TTM)

APAM:

$520.46M

EFC:

$284.66M

EBITDA (TTM)

APAM:

$443.04M

EFC:

$216.47M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, APAM achieves a -1.96% return, which is significantly lower than EFC's 9.04% return. Over the past 10 years, APAM has outperformed EFC with an annualized return of 8.67%, while EFC has yielded a comparatively lower 7.14% annualized return.


APAM

YTD

-1.96%

1M

10.68%

6M

-13.50%

1Y

0.69%

3Y*

9.58%

5Y*

15.94%

10Y*

8.67%

EFC

YTD

9.04%

1M

-2.54%

6M

8.09%

1Y

18.12%

3Y*

6.48%

5Y*

17.20%

10Y*

7.14%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Ellington Financial Inc.

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

APAM vs. EFC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

APAM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of APAM is 4545
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of APAM is 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of APAM is 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of APAM is 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of APAM is 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of APAM is 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

EFC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of EFC is 7878
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of EFC is 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of EFC is 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of EFC is 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of EFC is 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of EFC is 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

APAM vs. EFC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Artisan Partners Asset Management Inc. (APAM) and Ellington Financial Inc. (EFC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current APAM Sharpe Ratio is 0.02, which is lower than the EFC Sharpe Ratio of 0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of APAM and EFC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

APAM vs. EFC - Dividend Comparison

APAM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.81%, less than EFC's 13.44% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
APAM
Artisan Partners Asset Management Inc.
8.81%7.34%6.02%12.36%8.88%6.73%10.49%14.43%6.99%9.41%9.29%7.58%
EFC
Ellington Financial Inc.
13.44%13.20%14.16%14.55%9.60%8.49%9.87%10.70%12.13%12.56%14.60%15.43%

Drawdowns

APAM vs. EFC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APAM drawdown since its inception was -59.70%, smaller than the maximum EFC drawdown of -79.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APAM and EFC.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

APAM vs. EFC - Volatility Comparison

Artisan Partners Asset Management Inc. (APAM) has a higher volatility of 9.03% compared to Ellington Financial Inc. (EFC) at 5.28%. This indicates that APAM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EFC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

APAM vs. EFC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Artisan Partners Asset Management Inc. and Ellington Financial Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-100.00M0.00100.00M200.00M300.00M20212022202320242025
288.00M
72.28M
(APAM) Total Revenue
(EFC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

APAM vs. EFC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Artisan Partners Asset Management Inc. and Ellington Financial Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
43.6%
100.0%
(APAM) Gross Margin
(EFC) Gross Margin
APAM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Artisan Partners Asset Management Inc. reported a gross profit of 125.46M and revenue of 288.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 43.6%.

EFC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Ellington Financial Inc. reported a gross profit of 72.28M and revenue of 72.28M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

APAM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Artisan Partners Asset Management Inc. reported an operating income of 97.40M and revenue of 288.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 33.8%.

EFC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Ellington Financial Inc. reported an operating income of 30.92M and revenue of 72.28M, resulting in an operating margin of 42.8%.

APAM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Artisan Partners Asset Management Inc. reported a net income of 61.10M and revenue of 288.00M, resulting in a net margin of 21.2%.

EFC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Ellington Financial Inc. reported a net income of 38.68M and revenue of 72.28M, resulting in a net margin of 53.5%.