PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
AP2.DE vs. LRCX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


AP2.DELRCX
YTD Return33.66%21.26%
1Y Return76.29%71.38%
3Y Return (Ann)25.75%17.66%
5Y Return (Ann)39.68%39.33%
10Y Return (Ann)33.44%34.11%
Sharpe Ratio2.162.17
Daily Std Dev33.99%33.78%
Max Drawdown-81.29%-87.91%
Current Drawdown-0.99%-4.50%

Fundamentals


AP2.DELRCX
Market Cap€161.91B$119.68B
EPS€7.89$27.19
PE Ratio24.7033.67
PEG Ratio2.512.72
Revenue (TTM)€26.49B$14.24B
Gross Profit (TTM)€11.99B$7.87B
EBITDA (TTM)€8.14B$4.42B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.4

The correlation between AP2.DE and LRCX is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

AP2.DE vs. LRCX - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, AP2.DE achieves a 33.66% return, which is significantly higher than LRCX's 21.26% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with AP2.DE having a 33.44% annualized return and LRCX not far ahead at 34.11%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%10,000.00%20,000.00%30,000.00%40,000.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
4,323.90%
34,287.36%
AP2.DE
LRCX

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Applied Materials Inc

Lam Research Corporation

Risk-Adjusted Performance

AP2.DE vs. LRCX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Applied Materials Inc (AP2.DE) and Lam Research Corporation (LRCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AP2.DE
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for AP2.DE, currently valued at 2.36, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.002.36
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for AP2.DE, currently valued at 3.07, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.003.07
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for AP2.DE, currently valued at 1.40, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.40
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for AP2.DE, currently valued at 3.66, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.003.66
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for AP2.DE, currently valued at 13.43, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.0013.43
LRCX
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for LRCX, currently valued at 2.08, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.002.08
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for LRCX, currently valued at 2.80, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.80
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for LRCX, currently valued at 1.35, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.35
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for LRCX, currently valued at 3.67, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.003.67
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for LRCX, currently valued at 9.88, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.009.88

AP2.DE vs. LRCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AP2.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which roughly equals the LRCX Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of AP2.DE and LRCX.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.00December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
2.36
2.08
AP2.DE
LRCX

Dividends

AP2.DE vs. LRCX - Dividend Comparison

AP2.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, less than LRCX's 0.82% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
AP2.DE
Applied Materials Inc
0.65%0.83%1.15%0.66%1.26%1.51%2.53%0.85%1.20%0.00%0.00%0.71%
LRCX
Lam Research Corporation
0.82%0.95%1.53%0.78%1.04%1.54%2.79%1.01%1.28%1.36%0.68%0.00%

Drawdowns

AP2.DE vs. LRCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AP2.DE drawdown since its inception was -81.29%, smaller than the maximum LRCX drawdown of -87.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AP2.DE and LRCX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay0
-4.50%
AP2.DE
LRCX

Volatility

AP2.DE vs. LRCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Applied Materials Inc (AP2.DE) is 9.82%, while Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) has a volatility of 10.86%. This indicates that AP2.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LRCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
9.82%
10.86%
AP2.DE
LRCX

Financials

AP2.DE vs. LRCX - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Applied Materials Inc and Lam Research Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Please note, different currencies. AP2.DE values in EUR, LRCX values in USD