PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AP2.DE vs. ASML
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AP2.DE vs. ASML - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Applied Materials Inc (AP2.DE) and ASML Holding N.V. (ASML). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

AP2.DE is traded in EUR, while ASML is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ASML values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AP2.DE achieves a 91.32% return, which is significantly higher than ASML's 57.01% return. Over the past 10 years, AP2.DE has outperformed ASML with an annualized return of 36.36%, while ASML has yielded a comparatively lower 33.20% annualized return.


AP2.DE

1D
-0.64%
1M
18.05%
YTD
91.32%
6M
84.91%
1Y
200.69%
3Y*
51.80%
5Y*
31.28%
10Y*
36.36%

ASML

1D
-5.84%
1M
8.38%
YTD
57.01%
6M
51.42%
1Y
119.81%
3Y*
29.89%
5Y*
21.69%
10Y*
33.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AP2.DE vs. ASML - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AP2.DE
Applied Materials Inc
91.32%43.62%7.60%67.30%-36.93%107.75%27.25%101.20%-35.16%43.80%
ASML
ASML Holding N.V.
57.01%37.93%-1.61%35.71%-26.18%76.41%52.37%97.94%-5.56%37.03%

Correlation

The correlation between AP2.DE and ASML is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2007

0.37

Over the past year, AP2.DE and ASML have become more correlated (0.64) than their long-term average of 0.37, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AP2.DE vs. ASML — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AP2.DE
AP2.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
AP2.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AP2.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
AP2.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
AP2.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
AP2.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

ASML
ASML Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
ASML Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASML Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASML Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
ASML Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASML Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AP2.DE vs. ASML - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Applied Materials Inc (AP2.DE) and ASML Holding N.V. (ASML). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AP2.DEASMLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.60

1.43

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

9.08

7.42

+1.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

28.17

18.95

+9.22

AP2.DE vs. ASML - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AP2.DE Sharpe Ratio is 4.58, which is higher than the ASML Sharpe Ratio of 2.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AP2.DE and ASML, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AP2.DEASMLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.58

2.99

+1.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

0.54

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

0.88

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.80

-0.46

Drawdowns

AP2.DE vs. ASML - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AP2.DE drawdown since its inception was -81.29%, which is greater than ASML's maximum drawdown of -58.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AP2.DE and ASML.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AP2.DEASMLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.29%

-58.22%

-23.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.51%

-16.25%

-6.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-49.77%

-46.09%

-3.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.77%

-49.06%

-0.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.77%

-49.06%

-0.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.64%

-5.84%

+5.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-39.96%

-13.93%

-26.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.27%

6.35%

+0.92%

Volatility

AP2.DE vs. ASML - Volatility Comparison

Applied Materials Inc (AP2.DE) has a higher volatility of 14.96% compared to ASML Holding N.V. (ASML) at 14.23%. This indicates that AP2.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ASML based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AP2.DEASMLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.96%

14.23%

+0.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.05%

31.58%

+2.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.61%

40.25%

+4.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

40.13%

40.67%

-0.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.92%

37.71%

+1.21%

Dividends

AP2.DE vs. ASML - Dividend Comparison

AP2.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, less than ASML's 0.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AP2.DE
Applied Materials Inc
0.33%0.61%0.77%0.66%0.93%0.48%0.96%1.17%1.87%0.72%1.09%0.00%
ASML
ASML Holding N.V.
0.54%0.97%0.97%0.86%1.27%0.50%0.50%1.40%0.94%0.64%0.92%0.73%

Financials

AP2.DE vs. ASML - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Applied Materials Inc and ASML Holding N.V.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. AP2.DE values in EUR, ASML values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


AP2.DE and ASML have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AP2.DE and ASML

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer