AP2.DE vs. ASML
Compare and contrast key facts about Applied Materials Inc (AP2.DE) and ASML Holding N.V. (ASML).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: AP2.DE or ASML.
Key characteristics
| AP2.DE | ASML | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 31.03% | 21.36% |
| 1Y Return | 78.81% | 40.76% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 24.96% | 13.33% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 40.48% | 36.59% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 33.17% | 28.71% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.15 | 1.29 |
| Daily Std Dev | 34.00% | 33.05% |
| Max Drawdown | -81.29% | -90.00% |
| Current Drawdown | -2.94% | -12.45% |
Fundamentals
| AP2.DE | ASML | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | €161.91B | $367.08B |
| EPS | €7.89 | $19.44 |
| PE Ratio | 24.70 | 47.85 |
| PEG Ratio | 2.51 | 2.81 |
| Revenue (TTM) | €26.49B | $26.10B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | €11.99B | $10.70B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | €8.14B | $8.93B |
Correlation
The correlation between AP2.DE and ASML is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
AP2.DE vs. ASML - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, AP2.DE achieves a 31.03% return, which is significantly higher than ASML's 21.36% return. Over the past 10 years, AP2.DE has outperformed ASML with an annualized return of 33.17%, while ASML has yielded a comparatively lower 28.71% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
AP2.DE vs. ASML - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Applied Materials Inc (AP2.DE) and ASML Holding N.V. (ASML). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
AP2.DE vs. ASML - Dividend Comparison
AP2.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.66%, less than ASML's 0.72% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AP2.DE Applied Materials Inc | 0.66% | 0.83% | 1.15% | 0.66% | 1.26% | 1.51% | 2.53% | 0.85% | 1.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.71% |
ASML ASML Holding N.V. | 0.72% | 0.85% | 1.27% | 0.50% | 0.59% | 1.20% | 1.10% | 0.75% | 1.02% | 0.91% | 0.78% | 0.75% |
Drawdowns
AP2.DE vs. ASML - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AP2.DE drawdown since its inception was -81.29%, smaller than the maximum ASML drawdown of -90.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AP2.DE and ASML. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
AP2.DE vs. ASML - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Applied Materials Inc (AP2.DE) is 9.50%, while ASML Holding N.V. (ASML) has a volatility of 12.27%. This indicates that AP2.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASML based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
AP2.DE vs. ASML - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Applied Materials Inc and ASML Holding N.V.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities