AOT.TO vs. GDXJ
Compare and contrast key facts about Ascot Resources Ltd. (AOT.TO) and VanEck Vectors Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ).
GDXJ is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index. It was launched on Nov 10, 2009.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: AOT.TO or GDXJ.
Correlation
The correlation between AOT.TO and GDXJ is 0.23, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
AOT.TO vs. GDXJ - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
AOT.TO:
-0.71
GDXJ:
1.34
AOT.TO:
-1.14
GDXJ:
1.92
AOT.TO:
0.84
GDXJ:
1.23
AOT.TO:
-0.87
GDXJ:
0.74
AOT.TO:
-1.25
GDXJ:
5.56
AOT.TO:
67.19%
GDXJ:
9.29%
AOT.TO:
118.83%
GDXJ:
38.76%
AOT.TO:
-98.08%
GDXJ:
-88.66%
AOT.TO:
-95.83%
GDXJ:
-53.05%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AOT.TO achieves a -39.47% return, which is significantly lower than GDXJ's 44.84% return. Over the past 10 years, AOT.TO has underperformed GDXJ with an annualized return of -22.48%, while GDXJ has yielded a comparatively higher 10.89% annualized return.
AOT.TO
-39.47%
15.00%
-54.00%
-84.03%
-31.40%
-22.48%
GDXJ
44.84%
22.61%
26.22%
51.62%
9.12%
10.89%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
AOT.TO vs. GDXJ — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
AOT.TO
GDXJ
AOT.TO vs. GDXJ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ascot Resources Ltd. (AOT.TO) and VanEck Vectors Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
AOT.TO vs. GDXJ - Dividend Comparison
AOT.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GDXJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AOT.TO Ascot Resources Ltd. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GDXJ VanEck Vectors Junior Gold Miners ETF | 1.80% | 2.61% | 0.72% | 0.51% | 1.78% | 1.58% | 0.39% | 0.45% | 0.03% | 4.78% | 0.72% | 0.74% |
Drawdowns
AOT.TO vs. GDXJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AOT.TO drawdown since its inception was -98.08%, which is greater than GDXJ's maximum drawdown of -88.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AOT.TO and GDXJ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
AOT.TO vs. GDXJ - Volatility Comparison
Ascot Resources Ltd. (AOT.TO) has a higher volatility of 34.90% compared to VanEck Vectors Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) at 16.45%. This indicates that AOT.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GDXJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.