AOSL vs. SMH

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

AOSL (Alpha and Omega Semiconductor Limited) is a stock, while SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) is Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. Over the past 10 years, AOSL returned 8.40%/yr vs 34.16%/yr for SMH. Their 0.57 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently.

Performance

AOSL vs. SMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alpha and Omega Semiconductor Limited (AOSL) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AOSL achieves a 60.22% return, which is significantly higher than SMH's 50.09% return. Over the past 10 years, AOSL has underperformed SMH with an annualized return of 8.40%, while SMH has yielded a comparatively higher 34.16% annualized return.

AOSL

• 1D: 2.03%
• 1M: -14.47%
• 6M: 43.62%
• YTD: 60.22%
• 1Y: 27.88%
• 3Y*: -1.02%
• 5Y*: 4.08%
• 10Y*: 8.40%
• ALL TIME*: 3.51%

SMH

• 1D: 0.30%
• 1M: -8.74%
• 6M: 33.97%
• YTD: 50.09%
• 1Y: 90.95%
• 3Y*: 50.56%
• 5Y*: 33.46%
• 10Y*: 34.16%
• ALL TIME*: 11.06%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AOSL Alpha and Omega Semiconductor Limited	$17.26M	$21.59M	$37.72M
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF	$8.28B	$7.64B	$7.07B

AOSL vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AOSL Alpha and Omega Semiconductor Limited	60.22%	-46.50%	42.10%	-8.79%	-52.82%	156.18%	73.57%	33.66%	-37.71%	-23.08%
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF	50.09%	49.17%	39.10%	73.38%	-33.53%	42.13%	55.53%	64.45%	-9.05%	38.48%

Correlation

The correlation between AOSL and SMH is 0.70, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.70
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.63
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.69
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.63
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2010	0.57

The correlation between AOSL and SMH shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (all time) to 0.70 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

AOSL vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AOSL

AOSL Risk / Return Rank: 58
AOSL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
AOSL Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
AOSL Omega Ratio Rank: 61
AOSL Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
AOSL Martin Ratio Rank: 57

SMH

SMH Risk / Return Rank: 87
SMH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
SMH Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
SMH Omega Ratio Rank: 84
SMH Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
SMH Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AOSL vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha and Omega Semiconductor Limited (AOSL) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AOSL	SMH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.29	2.29	-2.01
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.00	2.70	-1.69
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	1.36	-0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.51	3.58	-3.07
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.97	14.64	-13.67

AOSL vs. SMH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AOSL Sharpe Ratio is 0.29, which is lower than the SMH Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AOSL and SMH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AOSL vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AOSL drawdown since its inception was -75.27%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AOSL and SMH.

Drawdown Indicators

	AOSL	SMH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-75.27%	-84.96%	+9.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-48.05%	-24.62%	-23.43%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-66.94%	-35.74%	-31.20%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-75.27%	-45.30%	-29.97%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-75.27%	-45.30%	-29.97%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-51.70%	-19.19%	-32.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-43.44%	-40.89%	-2.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	25.53%	6.01%	+19.52%

Volatility

AOSL vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison

Alpha and Omega Semiconductor Limited (AOSL) has a higher volatility of 32.99% compared to VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) at 14.70%. This indicates that AOSL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AOSL	SMH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	32.99%	14.70%	+18.29%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	72.85%	33.13%	+39.72%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	86.63%	38.57%	+48.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	72.25%	36.50%	+35.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	64.96%	33.32%	+31.64%

Dividends

AOSL vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison

AOSL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.20%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AOSL Alpha and Omega Semiconductor Limited	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF	0.20%	0.31%	0.44%	0.60%	1.18%	0.51%	0.69%	1.50%	1.88%	1.43%	0.80%	2.14%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AOSL and SMH in my portfolio?

AOSL and SMH have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AOSL or SMH?

AOSL has higher volatility (32.99%) compared to SMH (14.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AOSL dropped -75.27% vs SMH's -84.96%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.