PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AOSL vs. SMH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AOSL vs. SMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alpha and Omega Semiconductor Limited (AOSL) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AOSL achieves a 169.16% return, which is significantly higher than SMH's 75.55% return. Over the past 10 years, AOSL has underperformed SMH with an annualized return of 14.49%, while SMH has yielded a comparatively higher 37.55% annualized return.


AOSL

1D
21.51%
1M
23.77%
YTD
169.16%
6M
158.21%
1Y
149.74%
3Y*
22.99%
5Y*
11.89%
10Y*
14.49%

SMH

1D
4.01%
1M
24.01%
YTD
75.55%
6M
76.44%
1Y
160.66%
3Y*
63.68%
5Y*
39.58%
10Y*
37.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AOSL vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AOSL
Alpha and Omega Semiconductor Limited
169.16%-46.50%42.10%-8.79%-52.82%156.18%73.57%33.66%-37.71%-23.08%
SMH
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
75.55%49.17%39.10%73.38%-33.53%42.13%55.53%64.45%-9.05%38.48%

Correlation

The correlation between AOSL and SMH is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2010

0.57

The correlation between AOSL and SMH shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (all time) to 0.68 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AOSL vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AOSL
AOSL Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
AOSL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AOSL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
AOSL Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
AOSL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
AOSL Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

SMH
SMH Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
SMH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMH Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMH Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
SMH Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMH Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AOSL vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha and Omega Semiconductor Limited (AOSL) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AOSLSMHDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.99

5.29

-3.30

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.43

5.29

-2.86

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.73

-0.37

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.34

11.02

-7.68

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.63

42.34

-35.71

AOSL vs. SMH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AOSL Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is lower than the SMH Sharpe Ratio of 5.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AOSL and SMH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AOSLSMHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.99

5.29

-3.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

1.14

-0.97

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

1.16

-0.93

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.13

0.34

-0.21

Drawdowns

AOSL vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AOSL drawdown since its inception was -75.27%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AOSL and SMH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AOSLSMHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.27%

-84.96%

+9.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-45.32%

-14.93%

-30.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-66.94%

-35.74%

-31.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-75.27%

-45.30%

-29.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-75.27%

-45.30%

-29.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.87%

0.00%

-18.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-43.25%

-41.09%

-2.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

22.82%

3.89%

+18.93%

Volatility

AOSL vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison

Alpha and Omega Semiconductor Limited (AOSL) has a higher volatility of 43.20% compared to VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) at 11.59%. This indicates that AOSL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AOSLSMHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

43.20%

11.59%

+31.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

57.25%

24.29%

+32.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

75.61%

30.57%

+45.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

69.71%

35.02%

+34.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

63.41%

32.58%

+30.83%

Dividends

AOSL vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison

AOSL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AOSL
Alpha and Omega Semiconductor Limited
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SMH
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
0.17%0.31%0.44%0.60%1.18%0.51%0.69%1.50%1.88%1.43%0.80%2.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


AOSL and SMH have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AOSL has higher volatility (43.20%) compared to SMH (11.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AOSL dropped -75.27% vs SMH's -84.96%.

SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.29 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AOSL and SMH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer