AOSL vs. COST
Compare and contrast key facts about Alpha and Omega Semiconductor Limited (AOSL) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: AOSL or COST.
Correlation
The correlation between AOSL and COST is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
AOSL vs. COST - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
AOSL:
0.66
COST:
2.38
AOSL:
1.49
COST:
2.96
AOSL:
1.19
COST:
1.42
AOSL:
0.70
COST:
4.37
AOSL:
2.52
COST:
11.30
AOSL:
19.51%
COST:
3.98%
AOSL:
74.50%
COST:
18.85%
AOSL:
-74.90%
COST:
-53.39%
AOSL:
-42.91%
COST:
-4.01%
Fundamentals
AOSL:
$1.23B
COST:
$435.99B
AOSL:
-$0.69
COST:
$16.98
AOSL:
-8.49
COST:
5.99
AOSL:
$658.53M
COST:
$258.81B
AOSL:
$165.52M
COST:
$32.80B
AOSL:
$41.78M
COST:
$12.25B
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with AOSL having a 43.98% return and COST slightly higher at 45.49%. Over the past 10 years, AOSL has underperformed COST with an annualized return of 15.06%, while COST has yielded a comparatively higher 23.51% annualized return.
AOSL
43.98%
16.63%
15.30%
49.60%
21.92%
15.06%
COST
45.49%
2.65%
11.01%
48.60%
28.73%
23.51%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
AOSL vs. COST - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha and Omega Semiconductor Limited (AOSL) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
AOSL vs. COST - Dividend Comparison
AOSL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while COST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AOSL Alpha and Omega Semiconductor Limited | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
COST Costco Wholesale Corporation | 2.04% | 2.87% | 0.76% | 0.54% | 3.38% | 0.86% | 1.08% | 4.81% | 1.09% | 4.06% | 0.97% | 1.01% |
Drawdowns
AOSL vs. COST - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AOSL drawdown since its inception was -74.90%, which is greater than COST's maximum drawdown of -53.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AOSL and COST. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
AOSL vs. COST - Volatility Comparison
Alpha and Omega Semiconductor Limited (AOSL) has a higher volatility of 40.97% compared to Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) at 4.85%. This indicates that AOSL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
AOSL vs. COST - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Alpha and Omega Semiconductor Limited and Costco Wholesale Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities