AORT vs. RH
AORT (Artivion, Inc.) and RH (RH) are both stocks. AORT operates in Medical Devices (Healthcare), while RH operates in Specialty Retail (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, AORT returned 6.53%/yr vs 19.13%/yr for RH. Their 0.26 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
AORT vs. RH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AORT achieves a -41.18% return, which is significantly lower than RH's -7.61% return. Over the past 10 years, AORT has underperformed RH with an annualized return of 6.53%, while RH has yielded a comparatively higher 19.13% annualized return.
AORT
- 1D
- -3.04%
- 1M
- 11.93%
- 6M
- -34.19%
- YTD
- -41.18%
- 1Y
- -13.23%
- 3Y*
- 15.86%
- 5Y*
- -0.13%
- 10Y*
- 6.53%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.75%
RH
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- -2.11%
- 6M
- -16.75%
- YTD
- -7.61%
- 1Y
- -17.55%
- 3Y*
- -24.87%
- 5Y*
- -24.26%
- 10Y*
- 19.13%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.69%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
AORT Artivion, Inc. | $14.19M | $13.80M | $19.20M |
RH RH | $121.46M | $130.86M | $136.75M |
AORT vs. RH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AORT Artivion, Inc. | -41.18% | 59.53% | 59.90% | 47.52% | -40.44% | -13.81% | -12.85% | -4.55% | 48.20% | -0.00% |
RH RH | -7.61% | -54.48% | 35.03% | 9.09% | -50.15% | 19.76% | 109.61% | 78.18% | 38.99% | 180.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between AORT and RH is 0.20, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.32 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2012 | 0.26 |
The correlation between AORT and RH shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (1 year) to 0.32 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
AORT:
$1.30B
RH:
$3.13B
AORT:
$0.24
RH:
$5.28
AORT:
113.31
RH:
31.36
AORT:
2.89
RH:
0.94
AORT:
2.96
RH:
54.79
AORT:
$458.69M
RH:
$3.43B
AORT:
$292.61M
RH:
$1.49B
AORT:
$53.91M
RH:
$440.85M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AORT vs. RH — Risk / Return Rank
AORT
RH
AORT vs. RH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Artivion, Inc. (AORT) and RH (RH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AORT | RH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 0.99 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.23 | -0.36 | +0.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.48 | -0.59 | +0.11 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AORT vs. RH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AORT drawdown since its inception was -95.72%, which is greater than RH's maximum drawdown of -84.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AORT and RH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AORT | RH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.72% | -84.72% | -11.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -57.80% | -55.04% | -2.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -57.80% | -75.17% | +17.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.35% | -84.72% | +21.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -72.00% | -84.72% | +12.72% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -43.67% | -77.59% | +33.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -56.95% | -35.46% | -21.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 27.69% | 33.23% | -5.54% |
Volatility
AORT vs. RH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Artivion, Inc. (AORT) is 12.25%, while RH (RH) has a volatility of 17.32%. This indicates that AORT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AORT | RH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.25% | 17.32% | -5.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 46.40% | 47.86% | -1.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 53.64% | 62.02% | -8.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 45.47% | 62.12% | -16.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.84% | 64.08% | -19.24% |
Dividends
AORT vs. RH - Dividend Comparison
Neither AORT nor RH has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AORT Artivion, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.11% |
RH RH | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
AORT vs. RH - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Artivion, Inc. and RH. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
AORT vs. RH - Profitability Comparison
AORT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Artivion, Inc. reported a gross profit of 75.45M and revenue of 116.34M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 64.9%.
RH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, RH reported a gross profit of 331.26M and revenue of 800.33M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 41.4%.
AORT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Artivion, Inc. reported an operating income of 5.79M and revenue of 116.34M, resulting in an operating margin of 5.0%.
RH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, RH reported an operating income of 34.24M and revenue of 800.33M, resulting in an operating margin of 4.3%.
AORT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Artivion, Inc. reported a net income of 1.42M and revenue of 116.34M, resulting in a net margin of 1.2%.
RH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, RH reported a net income of -13.70M and revenue of 800.33M, resulting in a net margin of -1.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
AORT and RH have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RH has higher volatility (17.32%) compared to AORT (12.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AORT dropped -95.72% vs RH's -84.72%.
AORT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.25 vs -0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AORT and RH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer