AOR vs. VFQY
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF (AOR) and Vanguard U.S. Quality Factor ETF (VFQY).
AOR and VFQY are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AOR is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Target Risk Growth Index. It was launched on Nov 4, 2008. VFQY is an actively managed fund by Vanguard. It was launched on Feb 13, 2018.
Performance
AOR vs. VFQY - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
AOR vs. VFQY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AOR iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF | -0.42% | 16.44% | 10.68% | 15.75% | -15.64% | 11.19% | 11.42% | 18.91% | -6.22% |
VFQY Vanguard U.S. Quality Factor ETF | -1.89% | 10.24% | 12.93% | 22.48% | -15.74% | 27.96% | 16.97% | 25.75% | -7.85% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AOR achieves a -0.42% return, which is significantly higher than VFQY's -1.89% return.
AOR
- 1D
- 0.61%
- 1M
- -3.40%
- YTD
- -0.42%
- 6M
- 1.64%
- 1Y
- 15.12%
- 3Y*
- 11.88%
- 5Y*
- 6.12%
- 10Y*
- 7.81%
VFQY
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- -4.66%
- YTD
- -1.89%
- 6M
- -0.10%
- 1Y
- 13.14%
- 3Y*
- 12.99%
- 5Y*
- 7.20%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AOR vs. VFQY - Expense Ratio Comparison
AOR has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than VFQY's 0.13% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
AOR vs. VFQY — Risk / Return Rank
AOR
VFQY
AOR vs. VFQY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF (AOR) and Vanguard U.S. Quality Factor ETF (VFQY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AOR | VFQY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.41 | 0.68 | +0.74 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.04 | 1.09 | +0.94 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.15 | +0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.03 | 1.06 | +0.97 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.76 | 4.37 | +4.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AOR | VFQY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.41 | 0.68 | +0.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 | 0.39 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.74 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.66 | 0.48 | +0.18 |
Correlation
The correlation between AOR and VFQY is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
AOR vs. VFQY - Dividend Comparison
AOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.56%, more than VFQY's 1.20% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AOR iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF | 2.56% | 2.55% | 2.66% | 2.50% | 2.12% | 1.64% | 1.89% | 2.56% | 2.49% | 4.51% | 2.16% | 2.12% |
VFQY Vanguard U.S. Quality Factor ETF | 1.20% | 1.17% | 1.34% | 1.38% | 1.43% | 0.98% | 1.22% | 1.34% | 1.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
AOR vs. VFQY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AOR drawdown since its inception was -24.44%, smaller than the maximum VFQY drawdown of -37.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AOR and VFQY.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AOR | VFQY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.44% | -37.41% | +12.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.62% | -12.84% | +5.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.72% | -25.93% | +4.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.95% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.24% | -6.40% | +2.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.50% | -6.80% | +3.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.77% | 3.12% | -1.35% |
Volatility
AOR vs. VFQY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF (AOR) is 4.27%, while Vanguard U.S. Quality Factor ETF (VFQY) has a volatility of 4.69%. This indicates that AOR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VFQY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AOR | VFQY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.27% | 4.69% | -0.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.52% | 10.36% | -3.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.74% | 19.54% | -8.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.49% | 18.39% | -7.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.64% | 21.02% | -10.38% |