PortfoliosLab logo
AOHY vs. CLOZ
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between AOHY and CLOZ is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

AOHY vs. CLOZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Angel Oak High Yield Opportunities ETF (AOHY) and Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF (CLOZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%9.00%10.00%11.00%12.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
8.94%
10.85%
AOHY
CLOZ

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

AOHY:

1.59

CLOZ:

1.64

Sortino Ratio

AOHY:

2.17

CLOZ:

2.14

Omega Ratio

AOHY:

1.34

CLOZ:

1.58

Calmar Ratio

AOHY:

1.57

CLOZ:

1.46

Martin Ratio

AOHY:

8.42

CLOZ:

6.89

Ulcer Index

AOHY:

0.78%

CLOZ:

1.13%

Daily Std Dev

AOHY:

4.31%

CLOZ:

4.82%

Max Drawdown

AOHY:

-4.17%

CLOZ:

-5.33%

Current Drawdown

AOHY:

-0.74%

CLOZ:

-0.73%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AOHY achieves a 1.32% return, which is significantly higher than CLOZ's 0.73% return.


AOHY

YTD

1.32%

1M

3.58%

6M

1.48%

1Y

6.82%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

CLOZ

YTD

0.73%

1M

4.85%

6M

2.34%

1Y

7.84%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


AOHY vs. CLOZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

AOHY has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than CLOZ's 0.50% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

AOHY vs. CLOZ — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AOHY
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of AOHY is 9292
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of AOHY is 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of AOHY is 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of AOHY is 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of AOHY is 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of AOHY is 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

CLOZ
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CLOZ is 9292
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CLOZ is 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CLOZ is 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CLOZ is 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CLOZ is 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CLOZ is 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

AOHY vs. CLOZ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Angel Oak High Yield Opportunities ETF (AOHY) and Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF (CLOZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current AOHY Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is comparable to the CLOZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AOHY and CLOZ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.002.003.004.005.006.007.00Feb 23Mar 02Mar 09Mar 16Mar 23Mar 30Apr 06Apr 13Apr 20Apr 27May 04
1.59
1.64
AOHY
CLOZ

Dividends

AOHY vs. CLOZ - Dividend Comparison

AOHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.63%, less than CLOZ's 8.64% yield.


TTM20242023
AOHY
Angel Oak High Yield Opportunities ETF
6.63%6.06%0.00%
CLOZ
Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF
8.64%9.09%8.81%

Drawdowns

AOHY vs. CLOZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AOHY drawdown since its inception was -4.17%, smaller than the maximum CLOZ drawdown of -5.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AOHY and CLOZ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-5.00%-4.00%-3.00%-2.00%-1.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-0.74%
-0.73%
AOHY
CLOZ

Volatility

AOHY vs. CLOZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Angel Oak High Yield Opportunities ETF (AOHY) is 2.39%, while Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF (CLOZ) has a volatility of 3.26%. This indicates that AOHY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLOZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%1.00%2.00%3.00%4.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
2.39%
3.26%
AOHY
CLOZ