AOHY vs. CLOZ

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

AOHY (Angel Oak High Yield Opportunities ETF) and CLOZ (Panagram BBB-B CLO ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AOHY is a High Yield Bonds fund actively managed by Angel Oak, while CLOZ is a CLO fund actively managed by Panagram. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, AOHY returned 7.05% vs 6.62% for CLOZ. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AOHY charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for CLOZ.

Performance

AOHY vs. CLOZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Angel Oak High Yield Opportunities ETF (AOHY) and Panagram BBB-B CLO ETF (CLOZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AOHY achieves a 2.21% return, which is significantly lower than CLOZ's 2.62% return.

AOHY

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: 0.45%
• YTD: 2.21%
• 6M: 2.76%
• 1Y: 7.05%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CLOZ

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: 0.67%
• YTD: 2.62%
• 6M: 3.25%
• 1Y: 6.62%
• 3Y*: 10.65%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AOHY vs. CLOZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
AOHY Angel Oak High Yield Opportunities ETF	2.21%	7.62%	7.50%
CLOZ Panagram BBB-B CLO ETF	2.62%	5.99%	10.04%

Correlation

The correlation between AOHY and CLOZ is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.26
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2024	0.21

Return for Risk

AOHY vs. CLOZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AOHY

AOHY Risk / Return Rank: 73
AOHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
AOHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
AOHY Omega Ratio Rank: 78
AOHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
AOHY Martin Ratio Rank: 79

CLOZ

CLOZ Risk / Return Rank: 53
CLOZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
CLOZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
CLOZ Omega Ratio Rank: 83
CLOZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
CLOZ Martin Ratio Rank: 37

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AOHY vs. CLOZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Angel Oak High Yield Opportunities ETF (AOHY) and Panagram BBB-B CLO ETF (CLOZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AOHY	CLOZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.23	1.93	+0.29
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.42	2.47	+0.95
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.50	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.99	1.70	+1.29
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.09	5.66	+9.43
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AOHY vs. CLOZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AOHY Sharpe Ratio is 2.23, which is comparable to the CLOZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AOHY and CLOZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AOHY	CLOZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.23	1.93	+0.29
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.02	2.77	-0.76

Drawdowns

AOHY vs. CLOZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AOHY drawdown since its inception was -4.17%, smaller than the maximum CLOZ drawdown of -5.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AOHY and CLOZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	AOHY	CLOZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.17%	-5.32%	+1.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.37%	-3.90%	+1.53%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-5.32%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.21%	-0.03%	-0.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.35%	-0.38%	+0.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.47%	1.17%	-0.70%

Volatility

AOHY vs. CLOZ - Volatility Comparison

Angel Oak High Yield Opportunities ETF (AOHY) has a higher volatility of 0.99% compared to Panagram BBB-B CLO ETF (CLOZ) at 0.42%. This indicates that AOHY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLOZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AOHY	CLOZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.99%	0.42%	+0.57%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.50%	3.13%	-0.63%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.18%	3.45%	-0.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.79%	3.80%	-0.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.79%	3.80%	-0.01%

AOHY vs. CLOZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

AOHY has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than CLOZ's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

AOHY vs. CLOZ - Dividend Comparison

AOHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.51%, less than CLOZ's 7.38% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
AOHY Angel Oak High Yield Opportunities ETF	6.51%	6.53%	6.04%	0.00%
CLOZ Panagram BBB-B CLO ETF	7.38%	7.63%	9.09%	8.81%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AOHY and CLOZ in my portfolio?

AOHY and CLOZ have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AOHY or CLOZ?

AOHY has higher volatility (0.99%) compared to CLOZ (0.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AOHY dropped -4.17% vs CLOZ's -5.32%.

Which ETF is better, AOHY or CLOZ?

On 1-year performance, AOHY leads with 7.05% vs 6.62% for CLOZ. On fees, CLOZ is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, CLOZ has been the lower-risk option at 0.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AOHY or CLOZ?

Over the 1-year period, AOHY has performed better with a 7.05% return vs 6.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AOHY or CLOZ?

CLOZ is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for AOHY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AOHY or CLOZ?

CLOZ has the higher dividend yield at 7.38%, compared with 6.51% for AOHY.

What is the main difference between AOHY and CLOZ?

AOHY is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while CLOZ is CLO. They also come from different issuers: Angel Oak and Panagram. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for AOHY and 0.50% for CLOZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AOHY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 1.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.