AOD vs. XYLG

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund (AOD) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF (XYLG).

XYLG is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Cboe S&P 500 Half BuyWrite Index. It was launched on Sep 18, 2020.

Performance

AOD vs. XYLG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund (AOD) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF (XYLG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

AOD vs. XYLG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
AOD Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund	0.07%	32.14%	16.03%	12.65%	-17.15%	23.80%	14.35%
XYLG Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF	-2.15%	12.93%	22.31%	18.16%	-15.46%	23.81%	12.13%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AOD achieves a 0.07% return, which is significantly higher than XYLG's -2.15% return.

AOD

• 1D: 2.71%
• 1M: -9.47%
• YTD: 0.07%
• 6M: 5.96%
• 1Y: 28.05%
• 3Y*: 17.77%
• 5Y*: 9.96%
• 10Y*: 12.04%

XYLG

• 1D: 0.88%
• 1M: -3.11%
• YTD: -2.15%
• 6M: 2.08%
• 1Y: 14.74%
• 3Y*: 14.46%
• 5Y*: 9.42%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

AOD vs. XYLG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AOD

AOD Risk / Return Rank: 79
AOD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
AOD Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
AOD Omega Ratio Rank: 82
AOD Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
AOD Martin Ratio Rank: 84

XYLG

XYLG Risk / Return Rank: 55
XYLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
XYLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
XYLG Omega Ratio Rank: 60
XYLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
XYLG Martin Ratio Rank: 68

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AOD vs. XYLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund (AOD) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF (XYLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AOD	XYLG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.42	0.90	+0.51
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.93	1.41	+0.53
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.23	+0.08
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.68	1.32	+0.36
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.39	7.20	+0.19
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AOD vs. XYLG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AOD Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is higher than the XYLG Sharpe Ratio of 0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AOD and XYLG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AOD	XYLG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.42	0.90	+0.51
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.60	0.68	-0.07
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.65	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.14	0.86	-0.73

Correlation

The correlation between AOD and XYLG is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

AOD vs. XYLG - Dividend Comparison

AOD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.47%, less than XYLG's 14.65% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AOD Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund	12.47%	12.00%	10.73%	8.56%	8.85%	6.75%	7.80%	7.71%	9.57%	7.29%	9.10%	8.93%
XYLG Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF	14.65%	13.94%	23.65%	4.90%	6.43%	7.40%	1.39%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

AOD vs. XYLG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AOD drawdown since its inception was -72.26%, which is greater than XYLG's maximum drawdown of -21.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AOD and XYLG.

Drawdown Indicators

	AOD	XYLG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-72.26%	-21.30%	-50.96%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.71%	-11.39%	-5.32%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.92%	-21.30%	-7.62%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-43.68%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.57%	-3.84%	-6.73%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-27.50%	-4.21%	-23.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.80%	2.08%	+1.72%

Volatility

AOD vs. XYLG - Volatility Comparison

Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund (AOD) has a higher volatility of 9.57% compared to Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF (XYLG) at 4.85%. This indicates that AOD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XYLG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AOD	XYLG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.57%	4.85%	+4.72%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.20%	7.74%	+5.46%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.90%	16.40%	+3.50%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.55%	14.02%	+2.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.51%	13.98%	+4.53%