AOA vs. SCHD
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF (AOA) and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD).
AOA and SCHD are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AOA is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Target Risk Aggressive Index. It was launched on Nov 4, 2008. SCHD is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. It was launched on Oct 20, 2011. Both AOA and SCHD are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: AOA or SCHD.
Key characteristics
| AOA | SCHD | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 15.08% | 18.08% |
| 1Y Return | 25.06% | 30.78% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 4.50% | 7.17% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 9.02% | 13.03% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 7.94% | 11.72% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.54 | 2.85 |
| Sortino Ratio | 3.56 | 4.10 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.47 | 1.51 |
| Calmar Ratio | 2.69 | 3.16 |
| Martin Ratio | 16.70 | 15.75 |
| Ulcer Index | 1.49% | 2.04% |
| Daily Std Dev | 9.81% | 11.24% |
| Max Drawdown | -28.38% | -33.37% |
| Current Drawdown | -1.07% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between AOA and SCHD is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
AOA vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, AOA achieves a 15.08% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 18.08% return. Over the past 10 years, AOA has underperformed SCHD with an annualized return of 7.94%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively higher 11.72% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AOA vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
AOA has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
AOA vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF (AOA) and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
AOA vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison
AOA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.10%, less than SCHD's 3.35% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AOA iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF | 2.10% | 2.22% | 2.10% | 1.67% | 1.71% | 2.50% | 2.37% | 5.09% | 2.02% | 2.15% | 2.18% | 1.84% |
SCHD Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF | 3.35% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% | 2.63% | 2.47% |
Drawdowns
AOA vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AOA drawdown since its inception was -28.38%, smaller than the maximum SCHD drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AOA and SCHD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
AOA vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF (AOA) is 2.74%, while Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) has a volatility of 3.38%. This indicates that AOA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.