PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AOA vs. SCHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AOA vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF (AOA) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AOA achieves a 8.19% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 17.72% return. Over the past 10 years, AOA has underperformed SCHD with an annualized return of 10.74%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively higher 12.72% annualized return.


AOA

1D
-1.54%
1M
-0.18%
YTD
8.19%
6M
7.63%
1Y
21.66%
3Y*
16.66%
5Y*
8.78%
10Y*
10.74%

SCHD

1D
0.41%
1M
-2.47%
YTD
17.72%
6M
17.25%
1Y
24.56%
3Y*
14.60%
5Y*
8.71%
10Y*
12.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AOA vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AOA
iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF
8.19%19.59%13.55%18.27%-16.23%15.42%12.82%22.60%-7.86%20.05%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
17.72%4.34%11.66%4.54%-3.26%29.87%15.03%27.29%-5.56%20.85%

Correlation

The correlation between AOA and SCHD is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2011

0.80

Over the past year, the correlation between AOA and SCHD has dropped to 0.38 - well below their long-term average of 0.80, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AOA vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AOA
AOA Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
AOA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AOA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
AOA Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
AOA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
AOA Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHD
SCHD Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
SCHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHD Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHD Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AOA vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF (AOA) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AOASCHDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.40

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.65

5.35

-2.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.52

12.94

-1.42

AOA vs. SCHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AOA Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is comparable to the SCHD Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AOA and SCHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AOA vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AOA drawdown since its inception was -28.38%, smaller than the maximum SCHD drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AOA and SCHD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AOASCHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.38%

-33.37%

+4.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.20%

-4.61%

-3.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.94%

-16.13%

+3.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.62%

-16.85%

-6.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.38%

-33.37%

+4.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.08%

-2.47%

+0.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.04%

-3.31%

-0.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.88%

1.90%

-0.02%

Volatility

AOA vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF (AOA) has a higher volatility of 4.43% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 3.58%. This indicates that AOA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AOASCHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.43%

3.58%

+0.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.34%

7.73%

+1.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.25%

11.07%

+0.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.09%

14.36%

-1.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.51%

16.71%

-3.20%

AOA vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

AOA has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

AOA vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison

AOA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.08%, less than SCHD's 3.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AOA
iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF
2.08%2.18%2.30%2.22%2.10%1.67%1.71%2.50%2.37%5.09%2.26%2.15%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
3.30%3.82%3.64%3.49%3.39%2.78%3.16%2.98%3.06%2.63%2.89%2.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


AOA and SCHD have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AOA has higher volatility (4.43%) compared to SCHD (3.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AOA dropped -28.38% vs SCHD's -33.37%.

On 10-year performance, SCHD leads with 12.72% vs 10.74% for AOA. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SCHD has been the lower-risk option at 3.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SCHD has performed better with a 12.72% return vs 10.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for AOA.

SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.30%, compared with 2.08% for AOA.

AOA is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while SCHD is Dividend. AOA tracks S&P Target Risk Aggressive Index, while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for AOA and 0.06% for SCHD.

SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AOA and SCHD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer