PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AOA vs. EAOA
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

AOA vs. EAOA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF (AOA) and iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF (EAOA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

AOA vs. EAOA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
AOA
iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF
-0.73%19.59%13.55%18.27%-16.23%15.42%18.43%
EAOA
iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF
-1.32%18.41%13.79%18.27%-17.76%14.52%19.79%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AOA achieves a -0.73% return, which is significantly higher than EAOA's -1.32% return.


AOA

1D
-0.14%
1M
-2.63%
YTD
-0.73%
6M
1.53%
1Y
18.01%
3Y*
14.24%
5Y*
7.94%
10Y*
9.71%

EAOA

1D
-0.07%
1M
-2.63%
YTD
-1.32%
6M
0.69%
1Y
16.96%
3Y*
13.75%
5Y*
7.14%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


AOA vs. EAOA - Expense Ratio Comparison

AOA has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than EAOA's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

AOA vs. EAOA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AOA
AOA Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
AOA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AOA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
AOA Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
AOA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
AOA Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

EAOA
EAOA Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
EAOA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EAOA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
EAOA Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
EAOA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
EAOA Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AOA vs. EAOA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF (AOA) and iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF (EAOA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AOAEAOADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.30

1.21

+0.10

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.90

1.77

+0.13

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.26

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.93

1.76

+0.17

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.48

7.86

+0.63

AOA vs. EAOA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AOA Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is comparable to the EAOA Sharpe Ratio of 1.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AOA and EAOA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AOAEAOADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.30

1.21

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

0.54

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.79

-0.14

Correlation

The correlation between AOA and EAOA is 0.99, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

AOA vs. EAOA - Dividend Comparison

AOA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.26%, more than EAOA's 2.17% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AOA
iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF
2.26%2.18%2.30%2.22%2.10%1.67%1.71%2.50%2.37%5.09%2.26%2.15%
EAOA
iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF
2.17%2.10%2.09%2.21%1.93%1.48%1.12%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

AOA vs. EAOA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AOA drawdown since its inception was -28.38%, which is greater than EAOA's maximum drawdown of -25.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AOA and EAOA.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


AOAEAOADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.38%

-25.06%

-3.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.20%

-8.17%

-0.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.62%

-25.06%

+1.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.31%

-5.21%

-0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.08%

-5.44%

+1.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.18%

2.23%

-0.05%

Volatility

AOA vs. EAOA - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF (AOA) and iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF (EAOA) have volatilities of 5.20% and 5.16%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


AOAEAOADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.20%

5.16%

+0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.33%

8.42%

-0.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.87%

14.10%

-0.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.91%

13.18%

-0.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.51%

13.16%

+0.35%