AOA vs. EAOA
AOA (iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF) and EAOA (iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds from iShares - AOA tracks the S&P Target Risk Aggressive Index while EAOA tracks the BlackRock ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, AOA returned 8.77%/yr vs 8.15%/yr for EAOA. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. AOA charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for EAOA.
Performance
AOA vs. EAOA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with AOA having a 8.51% return and EAOA slightly higher at 8.74%.
AOA
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- -0.91%
- YTD
- 8.51%
- 6M
- 7.69%
- 1Y
- 20.66%
- 3Y*
- 16.81%
- 5Y*
- 8.77%
- 10Y*
- 10.92%
EAOA
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- -0.55%
- YTD
- 8.74%
- 6M
- 7.93%
- 1Y
- 20.90%
- 3Y*
- 16.60%
- 5Y*
- 8.15%
- 10Y*
- —
AOA vs. EAOA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AOA iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF | 8.51% | 19.59% | 13.55% | 18.27% | -16.23% | 15.42% | 18.40% |
EAOA iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF | 8.74% | 18.41% | 13.79% | 18.27% | -17.76% | 14.52% | 19.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between AOA and EAOA is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2020 | 0.99 |
The correlation between AOA and EAOA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AOA vs. EAOA — Risk / Return Rank
AOA
EAOA
AOA vs. EAOA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF (AOA) and iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF (EAOA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AOA | EAOA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.34 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.53 | 2.57 | -0.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.94 | 11.07 | -0.13 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AOA vs. EAOA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AOA drawdown since its inception was -28.38%, which is greater than EAOA's maximum drawdown of -25.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AOA and EAOA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AOA | EAOA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.38% | -25.06% | -3.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.20% | -8.17% | -0.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.94% | -13.84% | +0.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.62% | -25.06% | +1.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.38% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.78% | -1.78% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.04% | -5.27% | +1.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.89% | 1.89% | 0.00% |
Volatility
AOA vs. EAOA - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF (AOA) and iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF (EAOA) have volatilities of 4.31% and 4.52%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AOA | EAOA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.31% | 4.52% | -0.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.32% | 9.49% | -0.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.18% | 11.38% | -0.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.08% | 13.36% | -0.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.51% | 13.19% | +0.32% |
AOA vs. EAOA - Expense Ratio Comparison
AOA has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than EAOA's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
AOA vs. EAOA - Dividend Comparison
AOA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.07%, more than EAOA's 1.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AOA iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF | 2.07% | 2.18% | 2.30% | 2.22% | 2.10% | 1.67% | 1.71% | 2.50% | 2.37% | 5.09% | 2.26% | 2.15% |
EAOA iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF | 1.97% | 2.10% | 2.09% | 2.21% | 1.93% | 1.48% | 1.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, AOA and EAOA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
EAOA has higher volatility (4.52%) compared to AOA (4.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AOA dropped -28.38% vs EAOA's -25.06%.
On 5-year performance, AOA leads with 8.77% vs 8.15% for EAOA. On fees, AOA is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, AOA has been the lower-risk option at 4.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, AOA has performed better with a 8.77% return vs 8.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AOA is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for EAOA.
AOA has the higher dividend yield at 2.07%, compared with 1.97% for EAOA.
AOA tracks S&P Target Risk Aggressive Index, while EAOA tracks BlackRock ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for AOA and 0.18% for EAOA.
AOA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AOA and EAOA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer