ANXU.L vs. NASDX
Compare and contrast key facts about Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXU.L) and Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares (NASDX).
ANXU.L is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Growth TR USD. It was launched on Apr 18, 2018. NASDX is a passively managed fund by Blackrock that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Jan 18, 2000. Both ANXU.L and NASDX are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ANXU.L or NASDX.
Key characteristics
ANXU.L | NASDX | |
---|---|---|
YTD Return | 25.37% | 25.82% |
1Y Return | 38.05% | 26.96% |
3Y Return (Ann) | 9.93% | 5.27% |
5Y Return (Ann) | 21.36% | 16.57% |
10Y Return (Ann) | 18.25% | 15.43% |
Sharpe Ratio | 2.24 | 1.56 |
Sortino Ratio | 3.01 | 2.02 |
Omega Ratio | 1.40 | 1.30 |
Calmar Ratio | 3.01 | 1.98 |
Martin Ratio | 10.50 | 7.33 |
Ulcer Index | 3.51% | 4.07% |
Daily Std Dev | 16.47% | 19.03% |
Max Drawdown | -35.13% | -81.69% |
Current Drawdown | -0.05% | -0.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between ANXU.L and NASDX is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
ANXU.L vs. NASDX - Performance Comparison
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ANXU.L having a 25.37% return and NASDX slightly higher at 25.82%. Over the past 10 years, ANXU.L has outperformed NASDX with an annualized return of 18.25%, while NASDX has yielded a comparatively lower 15.43% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ANXU.L vs. NASDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ANXU.L has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than NASDX's 0.63% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ANXU.L vs. NASDX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXU.L) and Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares (NASDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ANXU.L vs. NASDX - Dividend Comparison
ANXU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NASDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares | 0.38% | 0.45% | 0.50% | 0.15% | 0.37% | 0.47% | 0.94% | 1.35% | 0.75% | 0.86% | 1.02% | 0.72% |
Drawdowns
ANXU.L vs. NASDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ANXU.L drawdown since its inception was -35.13%, smaller than the maximum NASDX drawdown of -81.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANXU.L and NASDX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ANXU.L vs. NASDX - Volatility Comparison
Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXU.L) and Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares (NASDX) have volatilities of 4.95% and 5.16%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.