ANXU.L vs. LYMS.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXU.L) and Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc (LYMS.DE).
ANXU.L and LYMS.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ANXU.L is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Growth TR USD. It was launched on Apr 18, 2018. LYMS.DE is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq 100®. It was launched on Jan 17, 2019. Both ANXU.L and LYMS.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ANXU.L or LYMS.DE.
Correlation
The correlation between ANXU.L and LYMS.DE is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
ANXU.L vs. LYMS.DE - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
ANXU.L:
0.35
LYMS.DE:
0.03
ANXU.L:
0.61
LYMS.DE:
0.18
ANXU.L:
1.08
LYMS.DE:
1.03
ANXU.L:
0.34
LYMS.DE:
0.02
ANXU.L:
1.25
LYMS.DE:
0.07
ANXU.L:
6.11%
LYMS.DE:
7.67%
ANXU.L:
21.83%
LYMS.DE:
22.30%
ANXU.L:
-35.13%
LYMS.DE:
-50.00%
ANXU.L:
-17.46%
LYMS.DE:
-24.52%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ANXU.L achieves a -14.13% return, which is significantly higher than LYMS.DE's -21.04% return. Over the past 10 years, ANXU.L has outperformed LYMS.DE with an annualized return of 15.93%, while LYMS.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 15.11% annualized return.
ANXU.L
-14.13%
-7.15%
-9.94%
6.93%
16.29%
15.93%
LYMS.DE
-21.04%
-11.66%
-14.13%
0.09%
14.97%
15.11%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ANXU.L vs. LYMS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
ANXU.L has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than LYMS.DE's 0.22% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ANXU.L vs. LYMS.DE — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
ANXU.L
LYMS.DE
ANXU.L vs. LYMS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXU.L) and Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc (LYMS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ANXU.L vs. LYMS.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither ANXU.L nor LYMS.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ANXU.L Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LYMS.DE Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.65% | 0.69% | 0.76% | 1.09% | 1.18% | 0.71% |
Drawdowns
ANXU.L vs. LYMS.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ANXU.L drawdown since its inception was -35.13%, smaller than the maximum LYMS.DE drawdown of -50.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANXU.L and LYMS.DE. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ANXU.L vs. LYMS.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXU.L) is 12.77%, while Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc (LYMS.DE) has a volatility of 14.12%. This indicates that ANXU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LYMS.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.