ANXU.L vs. LYMS.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXU.L) and Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc (LYMS.DE).
ANXU.L and LYMS.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ANXU.L is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Growth TR USD. It was launched on Apr 18, 2018. LYMS.DE is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq 100®. It was launched on Jan 17, 2019. Both ANXU.L and LYMS.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ANXU.L or LYMS.DE.
Key characteristics
| ANXU.L | LYMS.DE | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 15.90% | 15.59% |
| 1Y Return | 26.90% | 22.19% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 8.75% | 10.91% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 20.49% | 20.23% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 17.85% | 19.49% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.70 | 1.53 |
| Daily Std Dev | 16.96% | 16.52% |
| Max Drawdown | -35.13% | -50.00% |
| Current Drawdown | -4.90% | -7.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between ANXU.L and LYMS.DE is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
ANXU.L vs. LYMS.DE - Performance Comparison
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with ANXU.L having a 15.90% return and LYMS.DE slightly lower at 15.59%. Over the past 10 years, ANXU.L has underperformed LYMS.DE with an annualized return of 17.85%, while LYMS.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 19.49% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ANXU.L vs. LYMS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
ANXU.L has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than LYMS.DE's 0.22% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ANXU.L vs. LYMS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXU.L) and Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc (LYMS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ANXU.L vs. LYMS.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither ANXU.L nor LYMS.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ANXU.L Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LYMS.DE Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.65% | 0.69% | 0.76% | 1.09% | 1.18% | 0.71% | 0.48% |
Drawdowns
ANXU.L vs. LYMS.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ANXU.L drawdown since its inception was -35.13%, smaller than the maximum LYMS.DE drawdown of -50.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANXU.L and LYMS.DE. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ANXU.L vs. LYMS.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXU.L) is 5.60%, while Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc (LYMS.DE) has a volatility of 6.01%. This indicates that ANXU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LYMS.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.