ANXG.L vs. IWF
Compare and contrast key facts about Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXG.L) and iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF).
ANXG.L and IWF are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ANXG.L is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Apr 18, 2018. IWF is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Growth Index. It was launched on May 22, 2000. Both ANXG.L and IWF are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ANXG.L or IWF.
Key characteristics
| ANXG.L | IWF | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 23.62% | 32.01% |
| 1Y Return | 31.43% | 45.02% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 11.46% | 10.27% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 21.21% | 19.99% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.91 | 2.60 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.60 | 3.33 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.35 | 1.47 |
| Calmar Ratio | 2.49 | 3.30 |
| Martin Ratio | 7.56 | 13.03 |
| Ulcer Index | 4.02% | 3.36% |
| Daily Std Dev | 15.86% | 16.82% |
| Max Drawdown | -27.69% | -64.18% |
| Current Drawdown | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between ANXG.L and IWF is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
ANXG.L vs. IWF - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, ANXG.L achieves a 23.62% return, which is significantly lower than IWF's 32.01% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ANXG.L vs. IWF - Expense Ratio Comparison
ANXG.L has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than IWF's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ANXG.L vs. IWF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXG.L) and iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ANXG.L vs. IWF - Dividend Comparison
ANXG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IWF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.51%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ANXG.L Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IWF iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF | 0.51% | 0.67% | 0.91% | 0.50% | 0.66% | 0.99% | 1.27% | 1.10% | 1.43% | 1.37% | 1.33% | 1.29% |
Drawdowns
ANXG.L vs. IWF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ANXG.L drawdown since its inception was -27.69%, smaller than the maximum IWF drawdown of -64.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANXG.L and IWF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ANXG.L vs. IWF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXG.L) is 4.53%, while iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF) has a volatility of 5.20%. This indicates that ANXG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.