PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ANWPX vs. PRASX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ANWPX vs. PRASX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds New Perspective Fund Class A (ANWPX) and T. Rowe Price New Asia Fund (PRASX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ANWPX achieves a 7.38% return, which is significantly lower than PRASX's 31.43% return. Over the past 10 years, ANWPX has outperformed PRASX with an annualized return of 13.48%, while PRASX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.08% annualized return.


ANWPX

1D
0.11%
1M
5.20%
YTD
7.38%
6M
8.44%
1Y
20.52%
3Y*
18.63%
5Y*
8.96%
10Y*
13.48%

PRASX

1D
1.54%
1M
13.16%
YTD
31.43%
6M
34.83%
1Y
57.91%
3Y*
20.60%
5Y*
4.57%
10Y*
10.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ANWPX vs. PRASX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ANWPX
American Funds New Perspective Fund Class A
7.38%21.33%16.76%24.63%-25.92%17.64%33.42%30.10%-5.99%28.91%
PRASX
T. Rowe Price New Asia Fund
31.43%26.60%6.97%0.83%-22.60%-4.33%29.56%26.75%-15.13%40.64%

Correlation

The correlation between ANWPX and PRASX is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 1991

0.59

The correlation between ANWPX and PRASX shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (all time) to 0.74 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ANWPX vs. PRASX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ANWPX
ANWPX Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
ANWPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ANWPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
ANWPX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
ANWPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
ANWPX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

PRASX
PRASX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
PRASX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRASX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRASX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
PRASX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRASX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ANWPX vs. PRASX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds New Perspective Fund Class A (ANWPX) and T. Rowe Price New Asia Fund (PRASX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ANWPXPRASXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.54

3.01

-1.47

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.22

3.80

-1.59

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.56

-0.28

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.80

4.03

-2.23

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.57

15.67

-8.10

ANWPX vs. PRASX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ANWPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is lower than the PRASX Sharpe Ratio of 3.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ANWPX and PRASX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ANWPXPRASXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.54

3.01

-1.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.24

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

0.55

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

0.46

+0.21

Drawdowns

ANWPX vs. PRASX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ANWPX drawdown since its inception was -52.34%, smaller than the maximum PRASX drawdown of -70.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANWPX and PRASX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ANWPXPRASXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.34%

-70.53%

+18.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.48%

-14.39%

+2.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.93%

-18.34%

+0.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.45%

-41.93%

+7.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.45%

-45.07%

+10.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.11%

-18.53%

+10.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.72%

3.69%

-0.97%

Volatility

ANWPX vs. PRASX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Funds New Perspective Fund Class A (ANWPX) is 3.92%, while T. Rowe Price New Asia Fund (PRASX) has a volatility of 8.24%. This indicates that ANWPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRASX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ANWPXPRASXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.92%

8.24%

-4.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.79%

16.39%

-5.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.39%

19.26%

-5.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.21%

19.05%

-1.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.83%

18.30%

-0.47%

ANWPX vs. PRASX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ANWPX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is lower than PRASX's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

ANWPX vs. PRASX - Dividend Comparison

ANWPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.12%, more than PRASX's 0.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ANWPX
American Funds New Perspective Fund Class A
6.12%6.57%5.13%5.36%4.16%7.01%4.13%3.67%7.59%5.50%3.86%6.14%
PRASX
T. Rowe Price New Asia Fund
0.47%0.62%1.05%1.77%1.96%14.22%0.46%0.77%7.23%9.15%0.46%1.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


ANWPX and PRASX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PRASX has higher volatility (8.24%) compared to ANWPX (3.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ANWPX dropped -52.34% vs PRASX's -70.53%.

PRASX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.01 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ANWPX and PRASX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer