ANSS vs. CDNS

In the year-to-date period, ANSS achieves a -0.17% return, which is significantly higher than CDNS's -8.79% return. Over the past 10 years, ANSS has underperformed CDNS with an annualized return of 14.50%, while CDNS has yielded a comparatively higher 31.02% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ANSYS, Inc. (ANSS) and Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current ANSS Sharpe Ratio is 0.08, which is higher than the CDNS Sharpe Ratio of -0.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ANSS and CDNS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Neither ANSS nor CDNS has paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum ANSS drawdown since its inception was -63.28%, smaller than the maximum CDNS drawdown of -93.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANSS and CDNS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for ANSYS, Inc. (ANSS) is 5.72%, while Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS) has a volatility of 16.04%. This indicates that ANSS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CDNS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ANSYS, Inc. and Cadence Design Systems, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.