PortfoliosLab logo
ANSS vs. CDNS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between ANSS and CDNS is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

ANSS vs. CDNS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ANSYS, Inc. (ANSS) and Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

ANSS:

0.23

CDNS:

0.27

Sortino Ratio

ANSS:

0.54

CDNS:

0.75

Omega Ratio

ANSS:

1.07

CDNS:

1.10

Calmar Ratio

ANSS:

0.21

CDNS:

0.46

Martin Ratio

ANSS:

0.91

CDNS:

0.92

Ulcer Index

ANSS:

6.99%

CDNS:

14.61%

Daily Std Dev

ANSS:

25.25%

CDNS:

41.61%

Max Drawdown

ANSS:

-63.41%

CDNS:

-93.13%

Current Drawdown

ANSS:

-15.71%

CDNS:

-1.51%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ANSS:

$30.47B

CDNS:

$87.04B

EPS

ANSS:

$6.73

CDNS:

$3.93

PE Ratio

ANSS:

51.51

CDNS:

81.11

PEG Ratio

ANSS:

2.25

CDNS:

3.36

PS Ratio

ANSS:

11.80

CDNS:

17.86

PB Ratio

ANSS:

4.89

CDNS:

18.26

Total Revenue (TTM)

ANSS:

$2.58B

CDNS:

$4.87B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ANSS:

$2.29B

CDNS:

$4.56B

EBITDA (TTM)

ANSS:

$926.17M

CDNS:

$1.64B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ANSS achieves a 2.76% return, which is significantly lower than CDNS's 7.02% return. Over the past 10 years, ANSS has underperformed CDNS with an annualized return of 14.46%, while CDNS has yielded a comparatively higher 32.51% annualized return.


ANSS

YTD

2.76%

1M

14.93%

6M

4.29%

1Y

5.83%

5Y*

6.44%

10Y*

14.46%

CDNS

YTD

7.02%

1M

24.03%

6M

10.99%

1Y

11.29%

5Y*

31.49%

10Y*

32.51%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

ANSS vs. CDNS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ANSS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ANSS is 5858
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ANSS is 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ANSS is 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ANSS is 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ANSS is 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ANSS is 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

CDNS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CDNS is 6363
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CDNS is 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CDNS is 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CDNS is 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CDNS is 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CDNS is 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

ANSS vs. CDNS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ANSYS, Inc. (ANSS) and Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current ANSS Sharpe Ratio is 0.23, which is comparable to the CDNS Sharpe Ratio of 0.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ANSS and CDNS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

ANSS vs. CDNS - Dividend Comparison

Neither ANSS nor CDNS has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

ANSS vs. CDNS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ANSS drawdown since its inception was -63.41%, smaller than the maximum CDNS drawdown of -93.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANSS and CDNS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

ANSS vs. CDNS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ANSYS, Inc. (ANSS) is 6.60%, while Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS) has a volatility of 10.37%. This indicates that ANSS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CDNS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

ANSS vs. CDNS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ANSYS, Inc. and Cadence Design Systems, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B1.40B20212022202320242025
504.89M
1.24B
(ANSS) Total Revenue
(CDNS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ANSS vs. CDNS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between ANSYS, Inc. and Cadence Design Systems, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

82.0%84.0%86.0%88.0%90.0%92.0%94.0%96.0%20212022202320242025
85.6%
95.9%
(ANSS) Gross Margin
(CDNS) Gross Margin
ANSS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, ANSYS, Inc. reported a gross profit of 432.32M and revenue of 504.89M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 85.6%.

CDNS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cadence Design Systems, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.19B and revenue of 1.24B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 95.9%.

ANSS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, ANSYS, Inc. reported an operating income of 58.89M and revenue of 504.89M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.7%.

CDNS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cadence Design Systems, Inc. reported an operating income of 361.52M and revenue of 1.24B, resulting in an operating margin of 29.1%.

ANSS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, ANSYS, Inc. reported a net income of 51.87M and revenue of 504.89M, resulting in a net margin of 10.3%.

CDNS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cadence Design Systems, Inc. reported a net income of 273.58M and revenue of 1.24B, resulting in a net margin of 22.0%.