ANF vs. FNGS
Compare and contrast key facts about Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (ANF) and MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS).
FNGS is a passively managed fund by BMO Financial Group that tracks the performance of the NYSE FANG+ Index. It was launched on Nov 12, 2019.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ANF or FNGS.
Correlation
The correlation between ANF and FNGS is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
ANF vs. FNGS - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
ANF:
0.13
FNGS:
1.90
ANF:
0.60
FNGS:
2.46
ANF:
1.08
FNGS:
1.32
ANF:
0.19
FNGS:
2.80
ANF:
0.38
FNGS:
8.87
ANF:
20.09%
FNGS:
5.63%
ANF:
59.49%
FNGS:
25.86%
ANF:
-86.59%
FNGS:
-48.98%
ANF:
-40.31%
FNGS:
-1.77%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ANF achieves a -23.20% return, which is significantly lower than FNGS's 3.78% return.
ANF
-23.20%
-27.76%
-16.88%
7.84%
47.19%
18.89%
FNGS
3.78%
2.51%
33.81%
43.27%
30.21%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ANF vs. FNGS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
ANF
FNGS
ANF vs. FNGS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (ANF) and MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ANF vs. FNGS - Dividend Comparison
Neither ANF nor FNGS has paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ANF Abercrombie & Fitch Co. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.98% | 4.63% | 3.99% | 4.59% | 6.67% | 2.96% | 2.79% |
FNGS MicroSectors FANG+ ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
ANF vs. FNGS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ANF drawdown since its inception was -86.59%, which is greater than FNGS's maximum drawdown of -48.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANF and FNGS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ANF vs. FNGS - Volatility Comparison
Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (ANF) has a higher volatility of 20.08% compared to MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS) at 7.89%. This indicates that ANF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.