ANF vs. COST
Compare and contrast key facts about Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (ANF) and undefined (COST).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ANF or COST.
Performance
ANF vs. COST - Performance Comparison
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ANF vs. undefined - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (ANF) and undefined (undefined). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Drawdowns
ANF vs. COST - Drawdown Comparison
Volatility
ANF vs. COST - Volatility Comparison
Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (ANF) has a higher volatility of 16.50% compared to undefined (COST) at 9.48%. This indicates that ANF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.