ANF vs. COST
Compare and contrast key facts about Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (ANF) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ANF or COST.
Performance
ANF vs. COST - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ANF achieves a 72.29% return, which is significantly higher than COST's 46.90% return. Over the past 10 years, ANF has underperformed COST with an annualized return of 20.79%, while COST has yielded a comparatively higher 23.95% annualized return.
ANF
72.29%
6.55%
1.21%
107.33%
57.23%
20.79%
COST
46.90%
8.04%
19.38%
67.70%
28.61%
23.95%
Fundamentals
| ANF | COST | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $7.23B | $411.21B |
| EPS | $9.43 | $16.56 |
| PE Ratio | 15.01 | 56.04 |
| PEG Ratio | -24.52 | 5.63 |
| Total Revenue (TTM) | $3.61B | $254.45B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $2.33B | $32.10B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $640.91M | $12.15B |
Key characteristics
| ANF | COST | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.95 | 3.48 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.49 | 4.15 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.32 | 1.61 |
| Calmar Ratio | 3.35 | 6.65 |
| Martin Ratio | 6.67 | 17.21 |
| Ulcer Index | 16.31% | 3.97% |
| Daily Std Dev | 55.70% | 19.62% |
| Max Drawdown | -86.59% | -53.39% |
| Current Drawdown | -20.98% | 0.00% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Correlation
The correlation between ANF and COST is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ANF vs. COST - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (ANF) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ANF vs. COST - Dividend Comparison
ANF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while COST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.02%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ANF Abercrombie & Fitch Co. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.98% | 4.63% | 3.99% | 4.59% | 6.67% | 2.96% | 2.79% | 2.43% |
COST Costco Wholesale Corporation | 2.02% | 2.87% | 0.76% | 0.54% | 3.38% | 0.86% | 1.08% | 4.81% | 1.09% | 4.06% | 0.97% | 1.01% |
Drawdowns
ANF vs. COST - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ANF drawdown since its inception was -86.59%, which is greater than COST's maximum drawdown of -53.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANF and COST. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ANF vs. COST - Volatility Comparison
Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (ANF) has a higher volatility of 13.06% compared to Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) at 5.83%. This indicates that ANF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
ANF vs. COST - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Abercrombie & Fitch Co. and Costco Wholesale Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities