ANET vs. JBL

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Arista Networks, Inc. (ANET) and Jabil Inc. (JBL).

Performance

ANET vs. JBL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Arista Networks, Inc. (ANET) and Jabil Inc. (JBL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ANET vs. JBL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ANET Arista Networks, Inc.	-4.72%	18.55%	87.73%	94.07%	-15.58%	97.89%	42.86%	-3.46%	-10.56%	143.44%
JBL Jabil Inc.	19.31%	58.73%	13.25%	87.43%	-2.55%	66.40%	3.89%	68.49%	-4.41%	12.17%

Fundamentals

Market Cap ANET : $159.28B JBL : $29.26B
EPS ANET : $2.76 JBL : $7.41
PE Ratio ANET : 45.32 JBL : 36.69
PEG Ratio ANET : 1.06 JBL : 1.96
PS Ratio ANET : 17.67 JBL : 0.91
PB Ratio ANET : 12.88 JBL : 21.77
Total Revenue (TTM) ANET : $9.01B JBL : $32.67B
Gross Profit (TTM) ANET : $5.77B JBL : $2.95B
EBITDA (TTM) ANET : $4.10B JBL : $1.55B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ANET achieves a -4.72% return, which is significantly lower than JBL's 19.31% return. Over the past 10 years, ANET has outperformed JBL with an annualized return of 41.49%, while JBL has yielded a comparatively lower 31.34% annualized return.

ANET

• 1D: 1.69%
• 1M: -3.44%
• YTD: -4.72%
• 6M: -16.36%
• 1Y: 59.06%
• 3Y*: 43.82%
• 5Y*: 45.34%
• 10Y*: 41.49%

JBL

• 1D: 2.38%
• 1M: 4.13%
• YTD: 19.31%
• 6M: 26.68%
• 1Y: 99.67%
• 3Y*: 45.92%
• 5Y*: 39.19%
• 10Y*: 31.34%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

ANET vs. JBL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ANET

ANET Risk / Return Rank: 74
ANET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
ANET Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
ANET Omega Ratio Rank: 69
ANET Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
ANET Martin Ratio Rank: 75

JBL

JBL Risk / Return Rank: 92
JBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
JBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
JBL Omega Ratio Rank: 89
JBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
JBL Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ANET vs. JBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arista Networks, Inc. (ANET) and Jabil Inc. (JBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ANET	JBL	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.10	2.32	-1.22
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.70	2.75	-1.04
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.39	-0.17
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.16	5.61	-3.45
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.77	14.47	-9.70
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ANET vs. JBL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ANET Sharpe Ratio is 1.10, which is lower than the JBL Sharpe Ratio of 2.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ANET and JBL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ANET	JBL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.10	2.32	-1.22
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.99	1.06	-0.07
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.94	0.86	+0.08
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.79	0.35	+0.44

Correlation

The correlation between ANET and JBL is 0.44, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

ANET vs. JBL - Dividend Comparison

ANET has not paid dividends to shareholders, while JBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ANET Arista Networks, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
JBL Jabil Inc.	0.12%	0.14%	0.22%	0.25%	0.47%	0.45%	0.75%	0.77%	1.29%	1.22%	1.35%	1.37%

Drawdowns

ANET vs. JBL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ANET drawdown since its inception was -52.20%, smaller than the maximum JBL drawdown of -94.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANET and JBL.

Drawdown Indicators

	ANET	JBL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-52.20%	-94.92%	+42.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-28.33%	-17.86%	-10.47%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-50.42%	-36.83%	-13.59%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-52.20%	-57.34%	+5.14%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-22.95%	-3.98%	-18.97%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.48%	-44.75%	+29.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.82%	6.92%	+5.90%

Volatility

ANET vs. JBL - Volatility Comparison

Arista Networks, Inc. (ANET) has a higher volatility of 18.49% compared to Jabil Inc. (JBL) at 16.28%. This indicates that ANET's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ANET	JBL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	18.49%	16.28%	+2.21%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	36.69%	31.19%	+5.50%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	53.90%	43.22%	+10.68%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	45.96%	37.04%	+8.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	44.40%	36.68%	+7.72%

Financials

ANET vs. JBL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Arista Networks, Inc. and Jabil Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

ANET - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Arista Networks, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.56B and revenue of 2.49B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 62.9%.

JBL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Jabil Inc. reported a gross profit of 746.00M and revenue of 8.28B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 9.0%.

ANET - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Arista Networks, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.03B and revenue of 2.49B, resulting in an operating margin of 41.5%.

JBL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Jabil Inc. reported an operating income of 374.00M and revenue of 8.28B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.5%.

ANET - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Arista Networks, Inc. reported a net income of 955.80M and revenue of 2.49B, resulting in a net margin of 38.4%.

JBL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Jabil Inc. reported a net income of 223.00M and revenue of 8.28B, resulting in a net margin of 2.7%.