PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ANET vs. IRM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ANET vs. IRM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Arista Networks, Inc. (ANET) and Iron Mountain Incorporated (IRM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ANET achieves a 33.81% return, which is significantly lower than IRM's 56.13% return. Over the past 10 years, ANET has outperformed IRM with an annualized return of 43.63%, while IRM has yielded a comparatively lower 19.62% annualized return.


ANET

1D
2.72%
1M
1.52%
YTD
33.81%
6M
37.82%
1Y
95.29%
3Y*
62.81%
5Y*
52.17%
10Y*
43.63%

IRM

1D
1.65%
1M
1.00%
YTD
56.13%
6M
58.11%
1Y
33.67%
3Y*
37.11%
5Y*
28.11%
10Y*
19.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ANET vs. IRM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ANET
Arista Networks, Inc.
33.81%18.55%87.73%94.07%-15.58%97.89%42.86%-3.46%-10.56%143.44%
IRM
Iron Mountain Incorporated
56.13%-18.24%54.48%46.52%-0.08%87.74%0.98%5.87%-7.97%23.56%

Correlation

The correlation between ANET and IRM is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2014

0.27

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ANET:

$223.34B

IRM:

$38.39B

EPS

ANET:

$2.92

IRM:

$0.91

PE Ratio

ANET:

60.05

IRM:

140.41

PS Ratio

ANET:

23.01

IRM:

5.28

Total Revenue (TTM)

ANET:

$9.71B

IRM:

$7.25B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ANET:

$6.17B

IRM:

$2.94B

EBITDA (TTM)

ANET:

$4.21B

IRM:

$2.40B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ANET vs. IRM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ANET
ANET Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
ANET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ANET Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
ANET Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
ANET Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
ANET Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

IRM
IRM Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
IRM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IRM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
IRM Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
IRM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
IRM Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ANET vs. IRM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arista Networks, Inc. (ANET) and Iron Mountain Incorporated (IRM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ANETIRMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.81

1.07

+0.74

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.34

1.63

+0.71

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.21

+0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.61

1.38

+2.23

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.60

3.33

+4.27

ANET vs. IRM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ANET Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is higher than the IRM Sharpe Ratio of 1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ANET and IRM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ANETIRMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.81

1.07

+0.74

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.12

0.96

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.98

0.67

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.86

0.50

+0.36

Drawdowns

ANET vs. IRM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ANET drawdown since its inception was -52.20%, smaller than the maximum IRM drawdown of -55.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANET and IRM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ANETIRMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.20%

-55.71%

+3.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.33%

-25.15%

-3.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-50.42%

-39.03%

-11.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.42%

-39.03%

-11.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.20%

-39.03%

-13.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.35%

-2.73%

+1.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.41%

-13.17%

-2.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.47%

10.43%

+3.04%

Volatility

ANET vs. IRM - Volatility Comparison

Arista Networks, Inc. (ANET) has a higher volatility of 21.09% compared to Iron Mountain Incorporated (IRM) at 7.81%. This indicates that ANET's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IRM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ANETIRMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

21.09%

7.81%

+13.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

39.41%

23.83%

+15.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

52.97%

31.50%

+21.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

47.05%

29.59%

+17.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

44.90%

29.60%

+15.30%

Dividends

ANET vs. IRM - Dividend Comparison

ANET has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IRM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.57%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ANET
Arista Networks, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IRM
Iron Mountain Incorporated
2.57%3.88%2.60%3.63%4.96%4.73%8.39%7.69%7.32%5.93%6.17%7.07%

Financials

ANET vs. IRM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Arista Networks, Inc. and Iron Mountain Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B20222023202420252026
2.71B
1.94B
(ANET) Total Revenue
(IRM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ANET vs. IRM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Arista Networks, Inc. and Iron Mountain Incorporated over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20222023202420252026
61.9%
0
Portfolio components
ANET - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Arista Networks, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.68B and revenue of 2.71B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.9%.

IRM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Iron Mountain Incorporated reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.94B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

ANET - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Arista Networks, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.16B and revenue of 2.71B, resulting in an operating margin of 42.7%.

IRM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Iron Mountain Incorporated reported an operating income of 395.23M and revenue of 1.94B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.4%.

ANET - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Arista Networks, Inc. reported a net income of 1.02B and revenue of 2.71B, resulting in a net margin of 37.8%.

IRM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Iron Mountain Incorporated reported a net income of 143.67M and revenue of 1.94B, resulting in a net margin of 7.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ANET and IRM have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ANET has higher volatility (21.09%) compared to IRM (7.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ANET dropped -52.20% vs IRM's -55.71%.

ANET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ANET and IRM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer