ANCFX vs. SCHG
Compare and contrast key facts about American Funds Fundamental Investors Class A (ANCFX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG).
ANCFX is managed by American Funds. It was launched on Jan 8, 1978. SCHG is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Total Return Index. It was launched on Dec 11, 2009.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ANCFX or SCHG.
Correlation
The correlation between ANCFX and SCHG is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
ANCFX vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
ANCFX:
0.86
SCHG:
2.05
ANCFX:
1.11
SCHG:
2.68
ANCFX:
1.19
SCHG:
1.37
ANCFX:
1.26
SCHG:
2.91
ANCFX:
6.64
SCHG:
11.49
ANCFX:
2.18%
SCHG:
3.13%
ANCFX:
16.78%
SCHG:
17.49%
ANCFX:
-52.56%
SCHG:
-34.59%
ANCFX:
-11.48%
SCHG:
-3.88%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ANCFX achieves a 14.04% return, which is significantly lower than SCHG's 35.44% return. Over the past 10 years, ANCFX has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 11.87%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 16.66% annualized return.
ANCFX
14.04%
-7.41%
-1.39%
16.28%
11.07%
11.87%
SCHG
35.44%
3.33%
10.58%
35.25%
19.99%
16.66%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ANCFX vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
ANCFX has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ANCFX vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds Fundamental Investors Class A (ANCFX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ANCFX vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison
ANCFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%, more than SCHG's 0.42% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ANCFX American Funds Fundamental Investors Class A | 0.63% | 1.17% | 1.60% | 1.24% | 1.48% | 1.51% | 1.89% | 1.47% | 1.59% | 2.98% | 9.83% | 3.46% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.42% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% | 1.09% | 1.07% |
Drawdowns
ANCFX vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ANCFX drawdown since its inception was -52.56%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANCFX and SCHG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ANCFX vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
American Funds Fundamental Investors Class A (ANCFX) has a higher volatility of 11.28% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 4.97%. This indicates that ANCFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.