ANCFX vs. SCHG
Compare and contrast key facts about American Funds Fundamental Investors Class A (ANCFX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG).
ANCFX is managed by American Funds. It was launched on Jan 8, 1978. SCHG is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Total Return Index. It was launched on Dec 11, 2009.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ANCFX or SCHG.
Key characteristics
ANCFX | SCHG | |
---|---|---|
YTD Return | 11.54% | 12.12% |
1Y Return | 36.58% | 49.17% |
3Y Return (Ann) | 10.29% | 13.63% |
5Y Return (Ann) | 13.45% | 19.29% |
10Y Return (Ann) | 12.07% | 16.14% |
Sharpe Ratio | 3.08 | 3.12 |
Daily Std Dev | 11.88% | 15.54% |
Max Drawdown | -52.56% | -34.59% |
Current Drawdown | 0.00% | -0.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between ANCFX and SCHG is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
ANCFX vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, ANCFX achieves a 11.54% return, which is significantly lower than SCHG's 12.12% return. Over the past 10 years, ANCFX has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 12.07%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 16.14% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
ANCFX vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ANCFX vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds Fundamental Investors Class A (ANCFX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Sharpe ratio | Sortino ratio | Omega ratio | Calmar ratio | Ulcer Index | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
American Funds Fundamental Investors Class A | 3.08 | ||||
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 3.12 |
Dividends
ANCFX vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison
ANCFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.21%, more than SCHG's 0.43% yield.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
American Funds Fundamental Investors Class A | 5.21% | 5.80% | 4.98% | 10.97% | 2.61% | 7.34% | 10.96% | 7.68% | 4.66% | 6.28% | 9.83% | 3.46% |
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.43% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.27% | 1.22% | 1.09% | 1.07% |
Drawdowns
ANCFX vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ANCFX drawdown since its inception was -52.56%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. The drawdown chart below compares losses from any high point along the way for ANCFX and SCHG
Volatility
ANCFX vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for American Funds Fundamental Investors Class A (ANCFX) is 3.42%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) has a volatility of 4.07%. This indicates that ANCFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.