ANCFX vs. MOAT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ANCFX (American Funds Fundamental Investors Class A) and MOAT (VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, ANCFX returned 14.90%/yr vs 13.37%/yr for MOAT. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ANCFX charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for MOAT.

Performance

ANCFX vs. MOAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds Fundamental Investors Class A (ANCFX) and VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ANCFX achieves a 15.14% return, which is significantly higher than MOAT's -0.94% return. Over the past 10 years, ANCFX has outperformed MOAT with an annualized return of 14.90%, while MOAT has yielded a comparatively lower 13.37% annualized return.

ANCFX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 5.89%
• YTD: 15.14%
• 6M: 16.14%
• 1Y: 34.54%
• 3Y*: 26.09%
• 5Y*: 14.91%
• 10Y*: 14.90%

MOAT

• 1D: -1.37%
• 1M: 3.30%
• YTD: -0.94%
• 6M: -0.69%
• 1Y: 14.97%
• 3Y*: 11.34%
• 5Y*: 8.01%
• 10Y*: 13.37%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ANCFX vs. MOAT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ANCFX American Funds Fundamental Investors Class A	15.14%	24.21%	22.73%	25.86%	-16.66%	22.43%	14.92%	27.07%	-8.13%	22.80%
MOAT VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF	-0.94%	13.20%	10.73%	31.89%	-13.66%	24.12%	14.84%	34.79%	-1.28%	23.18%

Correlation

The correlation between ANCFX and MOAT is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.62
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.71
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.82
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 26, 2012	0.85

Over the past year, the correlation between ANCFX and MOAT has dropped to 0.62 - well below their long-term average of 0.85, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

ANCFX vs. MOAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ANCFX

ANCFX Risk / Return Rank: 75
ANCFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
ANCFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
ANCFX Omega Ratio Rank: 69
ANCFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
ANCFX Martin Ratio Rank: 82

MOAT

MOAT Risk / Return Rank: 27
MOAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
MOAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
MOAT Omega Ratio Rank: 27
MOAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
MOAT Martin Ratio Rank: 27

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ANCFX vs. MOAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds Fundamental Investors Class A (ANCFX) and VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ANCFX	MOAT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.58	1.09	+1.50
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.47	1.64	+1.83
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	1.19	+0.28
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.33	1.21	+2.12
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.41	3.77	+11.64
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ANCFX vs. MOAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ANCFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.58, which is higher than the MOAT Sharpe Ratio of 1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ANCFX and MOAT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ANCFX	MOAT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.58	1.09	+1.50
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.89	0.44	+0.45
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.84	0.72	+0.13
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.64	0.77	-0.13

Drawdowns

ANCFX vs. MOAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ANCFX drawdown since its inception was -53.29%, which is greater than MOAT's maximum drawdown of -33.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANCFX and MOAT.

Drawdown Indicators

	ANCFX	MOAT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.29%	-33.31%	-19.98%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.66%	-12.43%	+1.77%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.97%	-21.44%	+3.47%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.07%	-23.96%	-1.11%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.93%	-33.31%	-0.62%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-4.72%	+4.72%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.32%	-3.83%	-3.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.30%	3.98%	-1.68%

Volatility

ANCFX vs. MOAT - Volatility Comparison

American Funds Fundamental Investors Class A (ANCFX) and VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) have volatilities of 3.68% and 3.82%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ANCFX	MOAT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.68%	3.82%	-0.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.82%	9.87%	+0.95%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.75%	13.86%	-0.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.80%	18.18%	-1.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.73%	18.68%	-0.95%

ANCFX vs. MOAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

ANCFX has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than MOAT's 0.47% expense ratio.

Dividends

ANCFX vs. MOAT - Dividend Comparison

ANCFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.43%, more than MOAT's 1.37% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ANCFX American Funds Fundamental Investors Class A	7.43%	8.54%	8.90%	5.80%	4.98%	10.97%	2.61%	6.91%	9.31%	7.28%	4.71%	6.08%
MOAT VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF	1.37%	1.36%	1.37%	0.86%	1.25%	1.08%	1.46%	1.31%	1.79%	1.07%	1.17%	2.13%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ANCFX and MOAT in my portfolio?

ANCFX and MOAT have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ANCFX or MOAT?

MOAT has higher volatility (3.82%) compared to ANCFX (3.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ANCFX dropped -53.29% vs MOAT's -33.31%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ANCFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.