PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
ANA.MC vs. VLMTY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

ANA.MC vs. VLMTY

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

ANA.MC (Acciona) and VLMTY (Valmet Oyj) are both stocks. Both are in the Industrials sector — ANA.MC in Engineering & Construction, VLMTY in Specialty Industrial Machinery. Over the past 5 years, ANA.MC returned 15.65%/yr vs 7.23%/yr for VLMTY. At a correlation of -0.10, they often move in opposite directions.

Performance

ANA.MC vs. VLMTY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Acciona (ANA.MC) and Valmet Oyj (VLMTY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ANA.MC is traded in EUR, while VLMTY is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the VLMTY values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ANA.MC achieves a 31.04% return, which is significantly higher than VLMTY's -19.62% return.

ANA.MC

1D
-0.90%
1M
-5.65%
YTD
31.04%
6M
39.92%
1Y
67.22%
3Y*
18.86%
5Y*
15.65%
10Y*
16.62%

VLMTY

1D
0.80%
1M
-18.43%
YTD
-19.62%
6M
-27.44%
1Y
-17.37%
3Y*
-4.87%
5Y*
7.23%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ANA.MC vs. VLMTY - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
ANA.MC
Acciona		31.04%75.75%-15.49%-20.55%4.34%47.68%19.57%
VLMTY
Valmet Oyj		-19.62%18.48%20.62%-3.37%-28.77%88.63%-5.29%

Correlation

The correlation between ANA.MC and VLMTY is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2020

-0.10

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Acciona

Valmet Oyj

Often compared with ANA.MC:
ANA.MC vs. ANE.MCANA.MC vs. ^IBEX
Often compared with VLMTY:
VLMTY vs. ANDR.VI

Return for Risk

ANA.MC vs. VLMTY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
ANA.MC
ANA.MC Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
ANA.MC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ANA.MC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
ANA.MC Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
ANA.MC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
ANA.MC Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
VLMTY
VLMTY Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
VLMTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VLMTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
VLMTY Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
VLMTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
VLMTY Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ANA.MC vs. VLMTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Acciona (ANA.MC) and Valmet Oyj (VLMTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

ANA.MCVLMTYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.05
-0.65

+2.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.65
-0.72

+3.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

0.83

+0.54

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.08

-0.59

+4.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.53

-2.12

+11.65

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ANA.MC vs. VLMTY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ANA.MC Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which is higher than the VLMTY Sharpe Ratio of -0.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ANA.MC and VLMTY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

ANA.MCVLMTYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.05

-0.65

+2.69

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

0.17

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.16

+0.22

Drawdowns

ANA.MC vs. VLMTY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ANA.MC drawdown since its inception was -84.21%, which is greater than VLMTY's maximum drawdown of -44.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANA.MC and VLMTY.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

ANA.MCVLMTYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.21%

-44.03%

-40.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.95%

-30.04%

+14.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.15%

-35.14%

-2.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-51.11%

-44.03%

-7.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.11%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.90%

-29.37%

+20.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-36.96%

-15.35%

-21.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.87%

8.25%

-1.38%

Volatility

ANA.MC vs. VLMTY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Acciona (ANA.MC) is 9.62%, while Valmet Oyj (VLMTY) has a volatility of 15.75%. This indicates that ANA.MC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VLMTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

ANA.MCVLMTYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.62%

15.75%

-6.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.93%

22.31%

+4.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.81%

27.31%

+4.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.97%

42.81%

-13.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.98%

39.60%

-10.62%

Dividends

ANA.MC vs. VLMTY - Dividend Comparison

ANA.MC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%, less than VLMTY's 6.00% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ANA.MC
Acciona		1.76%2.30%3.64%2.74%2.10%1.89%1.34%3.02%3.29%3.42%2.90%2.02%
VLMTY
Valmet Oyj		6.00%4.38%5.62%5.73%5.27%2.71%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

ANA.MC vs. VLMTY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Acciona and Valmet Oyj. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.

Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities

Please note, different currencies. ANA.MC values in EUR, VLMTY values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions

ANA.MC and VLMTY have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ANA.MC and VLMTY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer