AN vs. MUSA

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

AN (AutoNation, Inc.) and MUSA (Murphy USA Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Cyclical sector — AN in Auto & Truck Dealerships, MUSA in Specialty Retail. Over the past 10 years, AN returned 14.70%/yr vs 22.80%/yr for MUSA. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

AN vs. MUSA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AutoNation, Inc. (AN) and Murphy USA Inc. (MUSA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AN achieves a -7.45% return, which is significantly lower than MUSA's 30.75% return. Over the past 10 years, AN has underperformed MUSA with an annualized return of 14.70%, while MUSA has yielded a comparatively higher 22.80% annualized return.

AN

• 1D: 1.10%
• 1M: -9.00%
• YTD: -7.45%
• 6M: -7.90%
• 1Y: 5.13%
• 3Y*: 11.04%
• 5Y*: 13.61%
• 10Y*: 14.70%

MUSA

• 1D: 2.03%
• 1M: -11.76%
• YTD: 30.75%
• 6M: 36.15%
• 1Y: 24.51%
• 3Y*: 22.65%
• 5Y*: 31.89%
• 10Y*: 22.80%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AN vs. MUSA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AN AutoNation, Inc.	-7.45%	21.57%	13.09%	39.96%	-8.17%	67.43%	43.51%	36.22%	-30.45%	5.51%
MUSA Murphy USA Inc.	30.75%	-19.15%	41.27%	28.20%	41.02%	53.33%	12.06%	52.66%	-4.63%	30.73%

Correlation

The correlation between AN and MUSA is 0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.00
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.13
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.23
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.28
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2013	0.31

Over the past year, the correlation between AN and MUSA has dropped to 0.00 - well below their long-term average of 0.31, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap AN : $6.63B MUSA : $9.84B
EPS AN : $18.31 MUSA : $28.85
PE Ratio AN : 10.43 MUSA : 18.23
PEG Ratio AN : 28.40 MUSA : 0.99
PS Ratio AN : 0.26 MUSA : 0.51
PB Ratio AN : 2.98 MUSA : 14.94
Total Revenue (TTM) AN : $27.49B MUSA : $19.68B
Gross Profit (TTM) AN : $4.88B MUSA : $487.10M
EBITDA (TTM) AN : $1.46B MUSA : $1.06B

Return for Risk

AN vs. MUSA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AN

AN Risk / Return Rank: 43
AN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
AN Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
AN Omega Ratio Rank: 39
AN Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
AN Martin Ratio Rank: 45

MUSA

MUSA Risk / Return Rank: 60
MUSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
MUSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
MUSA Omega Ratio Rank: 57
MUSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
MUSA Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AN vs. MUSA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AutoNation, Inc. (AN) and Murphy USA Inc. (MUSA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AN	MUSA	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.19	0.65	-0.46
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.46	1.09	-0.63
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.05	1.15	-0.10
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.18	1.22	-1.03
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.40	2.52	-2.12
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AN vs. MUSA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AN Sharpe Ratio is 0.19, which is lower than the MUSA Sharpe Ratio of 0.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AN and MUSA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AN	MUSA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.19	0.65	-0.46
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.38	1.07	-0.69
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.40	0.73	-0.34
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.23	0.76	-0.54

Drawdowns

AN vs. MUSA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AN drawdown since its inception was -90.15%, which is greater than MUSA's maximum drawdown of -35.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AN and MUSA.

Drawdown Indicators

	AN	MUSA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-90.15%	-35.54%	-54.61%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.39%	-19.72%	-1.67%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.54%	-35.54%	+6.00%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.54%	-35.54%	+6.00%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-63.63%	-35.54%	-28.09%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-15.89%	-12.87%	-3.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-38.68%	-9.98%	-28.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.76%	9.53%	+0.23%

Volatility

AN vs. MUSA - Volatility Comparison

AutoNation, Inc. (AN) has a higher volatility of 9.51% compared to Murphy USA Inc. (MUSA) at 8.54%. This indicates that AN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MUSA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AN	MUSA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.51%	8.54%	+0.97%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.57%	28.69%	-8.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.65%	37.98%	-10.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	36.09%	30.10%	+5.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	37.06%	31.18%	+5.88%

Dividends

AN vs. MUSA - Dividend Comparison

AN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MUSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
AN AutoNation, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MUSA Murphy USA Inc.	0.46%	0.53%	0.36%	0.43%	0.45%	0.52%	0.19%

Financials

AN vs. MUSA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between AutoNation, Inc. and Murphy USA Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

AN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AutoNation, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.21B and revenue of 6.55B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 18.5%.

MUSA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Murphy USA Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 4.82B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

AN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AutoNation, Inc. reported an operating income of 314.30M and revenue of 6.55B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.8%.

MUSA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Murphy USA Inc. reported an operating income of 205.20M and revenue of 4.82B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.3%.

AN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AutoNation, Inc. reported a net income of 205.40M and revenue of 6.55B, resulting in a net margin of 3.1%.

MUSA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Murphy USA Inc. reported a net income of 136.30M and revenue of 4.82B, resulting in a net margin of 2.8%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AN and MUSA in my portfolio?

AN and MUSA have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AN or MUSA?

AN has higher volatility (9.51%) compared to MUSA (8.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AN dropped -90.15% vs MUSA's -35.54%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MUSA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.65 vs 0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.