AN vs. LAD
AN (AutoNation, Inc.) and LAD (Lithia Motors, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Auto & Truck Dealerships industry within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Over the past 10 years, AN returned 14.70%/yr vs 15.04%/yr for LAD. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
AN vs. LAD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AN achieves a -7.45% return, which is significantly higher than LAD's -10.72% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with AN having a 14.70% annualized return and LAD not far ahead at 15.04%.
AN
- 1D
- 1.10%
- 1M
- -9.00%
- YTD
- -7.45%
- 6M
- -7.90%
- 1Y
- 5.13%
- 3Y*
- 11.04%
- 5Y*
- 13.61%
- 10Y*
- 14.70%
LAD
- 1D
- 0.67%
- 1M
- 1.78%
- YTD
- -10.72%
- 6M
- -6.61%
- 1Y
- -5.08%
- 3Y*
- 6.96%
- 5Y*
- -2.01%
- 10Y*
- 15.04%
AN vs. LAD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AN AutoNation, Inc. | -7.45% | 21.57% | 13.09% | 39.96% | -8.17% | 67.43% | 43.51% | 36.22% | -30.45% | 5.51% |
LAD Lithia Motors, Inc. | -10.72% | -6.34% | 9.32% | 62.03% | -30.63% | 1.84% | 100.73% | 94.57% | -31.96% | 18.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between AN and LAD is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 1996 | 0.48 |
Over the past year, AN and LAD have become more correlated (0.72) than their long-term average of 0.48, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
AN:
$6.63B
LAD:
$6.91B
AN:
$18.31
LAD:
$28.39
AN:
10.43
LAD:
10.41
AN:
0.26
LAD:
0.20
AN:
2.98
LAD:
1.08
AN:
$27.49B
LAD:
$37.73B
AN:
$4.88B
LAD:
$5.61B
AN:
$1.46B
LAD:
$1.52B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AN vs. LAD — Risk / Return Rank
AN
LAD
AN vs. LAD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AutoNation, Inc. (AN) and Lithia Motors, Inc. (LAD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AN | LAD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.19 | -0.15 | +0.34 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.46 | 0.01 | +0.45 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.00 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.18 | -0.19 | +0.37 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.40 | -0.39 | +0.79 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AN | LAD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 | -0.15 | +0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 | -0.05 | +0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 | 0.37 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | 0.23 | -0.01 |
Drawdowns
AN vs. LAD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AN drawdown since its inception was -90.15%, smaller than the maximum LAD drawdown of -95.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AN and LAD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AN | LAD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.15% | -95.17% | +5.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.39% | -31.73% | +10.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.54% | -37.79% | +8.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.54% | -51.71% | +22.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.63% | -61.16% | -2.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.89% | -26.11% | +10.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.68% | -27.60% | -11.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.76% | 15.46% | -5.70% |
Volatility
AN vs. LAD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AutoNation, Inc. (AN) is 9.51%, while Lithia Motors, Inc. (LAD) has a volatility of 11.37%. This indicates that AN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LAD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AN | LAD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.51% | 11.37% | -1.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.57% | 22.26% | -1.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.65% | 33.00% | -5.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.09% | 38.61% | -2.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.06% | 40.95% | -3.89% |
Dividends
AN vs. LAD - Dividend Comparison
AN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LAD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AN AutoNation, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LAD Lithia Motors, Inc. | 0.75% | 0.66% | 0.58% | 0.58% | 0.79% | 0.46% | 0.42% | 0.81% | 1.49% | 0.93% | 0.98% | 0.71% |
Financials
AN vs. LAD - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AutoNation, Inc. and Lithia Motors, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
AN vs. LAD - Profitability Comparison
AN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AutoNation, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.21B and revenue of 6.55B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 18.5%.
LAD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lithia Motors, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.42B and revenue of 9.27B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 15.3%.
AN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AutoNation, Inc. reported an operating income of 314.30M and revenue of 6.55B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.8%.
LAD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lithia Motors, Inc. reported an operating income of 21.30M and revenue of 9.27B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.2%.
AN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AutoNation, Inc. reported a net income of 205.40M and revenue of 6.55B, resulting in a net margin of 3.1%.
LAD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lithia Motors, Inc. reported a net income of 100.40M and revenue of 9.27B, resulting in a net margin of 1.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
AN and LAD have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LAD has higher volatility (11.37%) compared to AN (9.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AN dropped -90.15% vs LAD's -95.17%.
AN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.19 vs -0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AN and LAD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer