PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
AMZZ vs. FNGO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between AMZZ and FNGO is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.00.7

Performance

AMZZ vs. FNGO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long AMZN Daily ETF (AMZZ) and MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN (FNGO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
16.17%
10.50%
AMZZ
FNGO

Key characteristics

Daily Std Dev

AMZZ:

55.88%

FNGO:

49.51%

Max Drawdown

AMZZ:

-37.35%

FNGO:

-78.39%

Current Drawdown

AMZZ:

-13.45%

FNGO:

-15.30%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMZZ achieves a -1.88% return, which is significantly higher than FNGO's -5.37% return.


AMZZ

YTD

-1.88%

1M

-9.33%

6M

16.17%

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

FNGO

YTD

-5.37%

1M

-11.12%

6M

10.50%

1Y

90.49%

5Y*

47.29%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


AMZZ vs. FNGO - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMZZ has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than FNGO's 0.95% expense ratio.


AMZZ
GraniteShares 2x Long AMZN Daily ETF
Expense ratio chart for AMZZ: current value at 1.15% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%1.15%
Expense ratio chart for FNGO: current value at 0.95% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.95%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

AMZZ vs. FNGO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMZZ

FNGO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FNGO is 7575
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FNGO is 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FNGO is 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FNGO is 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FNGO is 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FNGO is 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

AMZZ vs. FNGO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long AMZN Daily ETF (AMZZ) and MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN (FNGO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
No data
AMZZ
FNGO


Chart placeholderNot enough data

Dividends

AMZZ vs. FNGO - Dividend Comparison

Neither AMZZ nor FNGO has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

AMZZ vs. FNGO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMZZ drawdown since its inception was -37.35%, smaller than the maximum FNGO drawdown of -78.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZZ and FNGO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-13.45%
-15.30%
AMZZ
FNGO

Volatility

AMZZ vs. FNGO - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares 2x Long AMZN Daily ETF (AMZZ) and MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN (FNGO) have volatilities of 14.77% and 15.24%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
14.77%
15.24%
AMZZ
FNGO
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab