PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
AMZZ vs. FNGO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


AMZZFNGO
Daily Std Dev56.67%49.15%
Max Drawdown-37.35%-78.39%
Current Drawdown-17.28%-18.99%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.7

The correlation between AMZZ and FNGO is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

AMZZ vs. FNGO - Performance Comparison

The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-20.00%0.00%20.00%40.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
4.61%
21.32%
AMZZ
FNGO

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


AMZZ vs. FNGO - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMZZ has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than FNGO's 0.95% expense ratio.


AMZZ
GraniteShares 2x Long AMZN Daily ETF
Expense ratio chart for AMZZ: current value at 1.15% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%1.15%
Expense ratio chart for FNGO: current value at 0.95% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.95%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

AMZZ vs. FNGO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long AMZN Daily ETF (AMZZ) and MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN (FNGO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AMZZ
Sharpe ratio
No data
FNGO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FNGO, currently valued at 1.63, compared to the broader market0.002.004.001.63
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for FNGO, currently valued at 2.08, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.002.08
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for FNGO, currently valued at 1.27, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.27
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for FNGO, currently valued at 1.76, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.001.76
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for FNGO, currently valued at 7.39, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.007.39

AMZZ vs. FNGO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Chart placeholderNot enough data

Dividends

AMZZ vs. FNGO - Dividend Comparison

Neither AMZZ nor FNGO has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

AMZZ vs. FNGO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMZZ drawdown since its inception was -37.35%, smaller than the maximum FNGO drawdown of -78.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZZ and FNGO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
-17.28%
-18.99%
AMZZ
FNGO

Volatility

AMZZ vs. FNGO - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares 2x Long AMZN Daily ETF (AMZZ) has a higher volatility of 18.87% compared to MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN (FNGO) at 17.82%. This indicates that AMZZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNGO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%MayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
18.87%
17.82%
AMZZ
FNGO