PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMZP vs. APLY
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

AMZP vs. APLY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon AMZN ETF (AMZP) and YieldMax AAPL Option Income Strategy ETF (APLY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

AMZP vs. APLY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
AMZP
Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon AMZN ETF
-13.27%9.56%37.42%7.73%
APLY
YieldMax AAPL Option Income Strategy ETF
-5.57%4.69%18.62%5.64%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMZP achieves a -13.27% return, which is significantly lower than APLY's -5.57% return.


AMZP

1D
4.39%
1M
-1.18%
YTD
-13.27%
6M
-9.25%
1Y
8.31%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

APLY

1D
3.07%
1M
-2.08%
YTD
-5.57%
6M
-0.24%
1Y
10.00%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


AMZP vs. APLY - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both AMZP and APLY have an expense ratio of 0.99%.


Return for Risk

AMZP vs. APLY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMZP
AMZP Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
AMZP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMZP Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMZP Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
AMZP Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMZP Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

APLY
APLY Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
APLY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APLY Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
APLY Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
APLY Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
APLY Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMZP vs. APLY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon AMZN ETF (AMZP) and YieldMax AAPL Option Income Strategy ETF (APLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AMZPAPLYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.26

0.37

-0.11

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.59

0.73

-0.14

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.11

-0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.30

0.56

-0.26

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.78

1.93

-1.15

AMZP vs. APLY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMZP Sharpe Ratio is 0.26, which is comparable to the APLY Sharpe Ratio of 0.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMZP and APLY, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AMZPAPLYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

0.37

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.45

+0.13

Correlation

The correlation between AMZP and APLY is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

AMZP vs. APLY - Dividend Comparison

AMZP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 24.42%, less than APLY's 38.63% yield.


TTM202520242023
AMZP
Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon AMZN ETF
24.42%22.04%15.15%2.45%
APLY
YieldMax AAPL Option Income Strategy ETF
38.63%36.38%24.95%14.36%

Drawdowns

AMZP vs. APLY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMZP drawdown since its inception was -27.36%, smaller than the maximum APLY drawdown of -30.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZP and APLY.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


AMZPAPLYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.36%

-30.41%

+3.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.64%

-21.07%

-2.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.39%

-8.85%

-10.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.12%

-7.14%

+1.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.98%

6.05%

+2.93%

Volatility

AMZP vs. APLY - Volatility Comparison

Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon AMZN ETF (AMZP) has a higher volatility of 10.82% compared to YieldMax AAPL Option Income Strategy ETF (APLY) at 4.88%. This indicates that AMZP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than APLY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


AMZPAPLYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.82%

4.88%

+5.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.03%

12.60%

+9.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.81%

26.93%

+4.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.52%

21.16%

+5.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.52%

21.16%

+5.36%