AMZA vs. SCHD
AMZA (InfraCap MLP ETF) and SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AMZA is a MLPs fund actively managed by Virtus Investment Partners, while SCHD is a Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. AMZA is actively managed, while SCHD is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, AMZA returned 4.86%/yr vs 12.77%/yr for SCHD. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AMZA charges 2.01%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SCHD.
Performance
AMZA vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMZA achieves a 22.22% return, which is significantly higher than SCHD's 19.01% return. Over the past 10 years, AMZA has underperformed SCHD with an annualized return of 4.86%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively higher 12.77% annualized return.
AMZA
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- -0.92%
- YTD
- 22.22%
- 6M
- 20.41%
- 1Y
- 17.55%
- 3Y*
- 22.02%
- 5Y*
- 19.41%
- 10Y*
- 4.86%
SCHD
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 2.70%
- YTD
- 19.01%
- 6M
- 18.63%
- 1Y
- 27.16%
- 3Y*
- 15.09%
- 5Y*
- 8.36%
- 10Y*
- 12.77%
AMZA vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMZA InfraCap MLP ETF | 22.22% | 0.17% | 30.90% | 23.35% | 33.20% | 51.22% | -49.25% | 6.27% | -26.78% | -6.90% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 19.01% | 4.34% | 11.66% | 4.54% | -3.26% | 29.87% | 15.03% | 27.29% | -5.56% | 20.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMZA and SCHD is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2014 | 0.51 |
The correlation between AMZA and SCHD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.43 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.
AMZA vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AMZA
SCHD
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Energy
AMZA
SCHD
Utilities
AMZA
SCHD
Basic Materials
AMZA
-
SCHD
Communication Services
AMZA
-
SCHD
Consumer Cyclical
AMZA
-
SCHD
Consumer Defensive
AMZA
-
SCHD
Financial Services
AMZA
-
SCHD
Healthcare
AMZA
-
SCHD
Industrials
AMZA
-
SCHD
Real Estate
AMZA
-
SCHD
-
Technology
AMZA
-
SCHD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMZA vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank
AMZA
SCHD
AMZA vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for InfraCap MLP ETF (AMZA) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AMZA | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.00 | 2.49 | -1.49 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.48 | 3.87 | -2.39 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.45 | -0.27 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.45 | 5.91 | -4.46 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.65 | 14.53 | -10.88 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AMZA | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 | 2.49 | -1.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 | 0.58 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.13 | 0.77 | -0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.02 | 0.86 | -0.88 |
Drawdowns
AMZA vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMZA drawdown since its inception was -91.46%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZA and SCHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMZA | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.46% | -33.37% | -58.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.16% | -4.61% | -7.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.56% | -16.13% | -2.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.15% | -16.85% | -8.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -86.84% | -33.37% | -53.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.19% | -1.40% | -8.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -45.02% | -3.32% | -41.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.82% | 1.88% | +2.94% |
Volatility
AMZA vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison
InfraCap MLP ETF (AMZA) has a higher volatility of 5.80% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 2.66%. This indicates that AMZA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMZA | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.80% | 2.66% | +3.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.40% | 7.66% | +5.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.72% | 10.96% | +6.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.84% | 14.38% | +11.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.25% | 16.72% | +20.53% |
AMZA vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMZA has a 2.01% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
AMZA vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison
AMZA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.02%, more than SCHD's 3.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMZA InfraCap MLP ETF | 8.02% | 8.81% | 7.29% | 9.40% | 7.65% | 10.24% | 22.13% | 19.47% | 34.46% | 24.16% | 18.36% | 18.21% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 3.26% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AMZA and SCHD have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AMZA has higher volatility (5.80%) compared to SCHD (2.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMZA dropped -91.46% vs SCHD's -33.37%.
On 10-year performance, SCHD leads with 12.77% vs 4.86% for AMZA. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SCHD has been the lower-risk option at 2.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SCHD has performed better with a 12.77% return vs 4.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 2.01% for AMZA.
AMZA has the higher dividend yield at 8.02%, compared with 3.26% for SCHD.
AMZA is categorized as MLPs, while SCHD is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: Virtus Investment Partners and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 2.01% for AMZA and 0.06% for SCHD.
SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AMZA and SCHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer