PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
AMZA vs. QYLD
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

AMZA vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in InfraCap MLP ETF (AMZA) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
20.25%
9.11%
AMZA
QYLD

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMZA achieves a 38.19% return, which is significantly higher than QYLD's 16.23% return. Over the past 10 years, AMZA has underperformed QYLD with an annualized return of -2.45%, while QYLD has yielded a comparatively higher 8.46% annualized return.


AMZA

YTD

38.19%

1M

14.02%

6M

20.25%

1Y

36.58%

5Y (annualized)

13.53%

10Y (annualized)

-2.45%

QYLD

YTD

16.23%

1M

0.51%

6M

9.61%

1Y

19.69%

5Y (annualized)

7.34%

10Y (annualized)

8.46%

Key characteristics


AMZAQYLD
Sharpe Ratio1.931.92
Sortino Ratio2.612.61
Omega Ratio1.321.46
Calmar Ratio0.802.57
Martin Ratio9.0813.85
Ulcer Index4.03%1.44%
Daily Std Dev18.92%10.35%
Max Drawdown-91.46%-24.75%
Current Drawdown-22.61%-1.61%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


AMZA vs. QYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMZA has a 2.01% expense ratio, which is higher than QYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.


AMZA
InfraCap MLP ETF
Expense ratio chart for AMZA: current value at 2.01% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%2.01%
Expense ratio chart for QYLD: current value at 0.60% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.60%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.3

The correlation between AMZA and QYLD is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

AMZA vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for InfraCap MLP ETF (AMZA) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for AMZA, currently valued at 1.93, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.931.90
The chart of Sortino ratio for AMZA, currently valued at 2.61, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.002.612.59
The chart of Omega ratio for AMZA, currently valued at 1.32, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.321.46
The chart of Calmar ratio for AMZA, currently valued at 0.80, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.802.54
The chart of Martin ratio for AMZA, currently valued at 9.08, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.009.0813.67
AMZA
QYLD

The current AMZA Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is comparable to the QYLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMZA and QYLD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.501.001.502.002.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.93
1.90
AMZA
QYLD

Dividends

AMZA vs. QYLD - Dividend Comparison

AMZA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.82%, less than QYLD's 11.65% yield.


TTM2023202220212020201920182017201620152014
AMZA
InfraCap MLP ETF
6.82%9.40%7.65%10.24%22.13%19.47%34.46%24.16%18.36%18.21%0.00%
QYLD
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
11.65%11.78%13.75%12.85%11.16%9.84%12.44%7.69%9.15%9.42%10.74%

Drawdowns

AMZA vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMZA drawdown since its inception was -91.46%, which is greater than QYLD's maximum drawdown of -24.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZA and QYLD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-22.61%
-1.61%
AMZA
QYLD

Volatility

AMZA vs. QYLD - Volatility Comparison

InfraCap MLP ETF (AMZA) has a higher volatility of 5.51% compared to Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) at 3.42%. This indicates that AMZA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
5.51%
3.42%
AMZA
QYLD