PortfoliosLab logo
AMWD vs. GFF
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between AMWD and GFF is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

AMWD vs. GFF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Woodmark Corporation (AMWD) and Griffon Corporation (GFF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

1,000.00%2,000.00%3,000.00%4,000.00%5,000.00%6,000.00%7,000.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
1,095.18%
6,228.75%
AMWD
GFF

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

AMWD:

-0.92

GFF:

-0.03

Sortino Ratio

AMWD:

-1.31

GFF:

0.42

Omega Ratio

AMWD:

0.84

GFF:

1.06

Calmar Ratio

AMWD:

-0.62

GFF:

0.10

Martin Ratio

AMWD:

-1.63

GFF:

0.20

Ulcer Index

AMWD:

23.64%

GFF:

12.78%

Daily Std Dev

AMWD:

40.17%

GFF:

45.71%

Max Drawdown

AMWD:

-85.55%

GFF:

-75.71%

Current Drawdown

AMWD:

-58.04%

GFF:

-16.51%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AMWD:

$884.30M

GFF:

$3.38B

EPS

AMWD:

$6.48

GFF:

$4.90

PE Ratio

AMWD:

9.20

GFF:

14.51

PEG Ratio

AMWD:

2.46

GFF:

2.36

PS Ratio

AMWD:

0.50

GFF:

1.29

PB Ratio

AMWD:

0.98

GFF:

14.83

Total Revenue (TTM)

AMWD:

$1.31B

GFF:

$1.94B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AMWD:

$238.34M

GFF:

$792.65M

EBITDA (TTM)

AMWD:

$143.07M

GFF:

$389.26M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMWD achieves a -26.12% return, which is significantly lower than GFF's -0.24% return. Over the past 10 years, AMWD has underperformed GFF with an annualized return of 1.46%, while GFF has yielded a comparatively higher 19.96% annualized return.


AMWD

YTD

-26.12%

1M

9.43%

6M

-40.96%

1Y

-36.93%

5Y*

1.66%

10Y*

1.46%

GFF

YTD

-0.24%

1M

8.13%

6M

4.82%

1Y

-1.53%

5Y*

40.60%

10Y*

19.96%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

AMWD vs. GFF — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMWD
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of AMWD is 88
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of AMWD is 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of AMWD is 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of AMWD is 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of AMWD is 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of AMWD is 55
Martin Ratio Rank

GFF
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GFF is 5252
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GFF is 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GFF is 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GFF is 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GFF is 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GFF is 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

AMWD vs. GFF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Woodmark Corporation (AMWD) and Griffon Corporation (GFF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current AMWD Sharpe Ratio is -0.92, which is lower than the GFF Sharpe Ratio of -0.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMWD and GFF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.50-1.00-0.500.000.501.001.502.00December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-0.92
-0.03
AMWD
GFF

Dividends

AMWD vs. GFF - Dividend Comparison

AMWD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GFF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
AMWD
American Woodmark Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GFF
Griffon Corporation
0.93%0.88%4.10%6.62%1.16%1.50%1.45%12.28%1.23%0.80%0.96%0.98%

Drawdowns

AMWD vs. GFF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMWD drawdown since its inception was -85.55%, which is greater than GFF's maximum drawdown of -75.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMWD and GFF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-58.04%
-16.51%
AMWD
GFF

Volatility

AMWD vs. GFF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Woodmark Corporation (AMWD) is 12.68%, while Griffon Corporation (GFF) has a volatility of 13.98%. This indicates that AMWD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GFF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
12.68%
13.98%
AMWD
GFF

Financials

AMWD vs. GFF - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between American Woodmark Corporation and Griffon Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


400.00M500.00M600.00M700.00M800.00MJulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025
397.58M
632.37M
(AMWD) Total Revenue
(GFF) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

AMWD vs. GFF - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between American Woodmark Corporation and Griffon Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%15.0%20.0%25.0%30.0%35.0%40.0%45.0%JulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025
15.0%
41.8%
(AMWD) Gross Margin
(GFF) Gross Margin
AMWD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, American Woodmark Corporation reported a gross profit of 59.76M and revenue of 397.58M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 15.0%.

GFF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Griffon Corporation reported a gross profit of 264.28M and revenue of 632.37M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 41.8%.

AMWD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, American Woodmark Corporation reported an operating income of 21.08M and revenue of 397.58M, resulting in an operating margin of 5.3%.

GFF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Griffon Corporation reported an operating income of 112.10M and revenue of 632.37M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.7%.

AMWD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, American Woodmark Corporation reported a net income of 16.57M and revenue of 397.58M, resulting in a net margin of 4.2%.

GFF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Griffon Corporation reported a net income of 70.85M and revenue of 632.37M, resulting in a net margin of 11.2%.