AMWD vs. GFF
AMWD (American Woodmark Corporation) and GFF (Griffon Corporation) are both stocks. AMWD operates in Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances (Consumer Cyclical), while GFF operates in Tools & Accessories (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, AMWD returned -5.15%/yr vs 21.55%/yr for GFF. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
AMWD vs. GFF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMWD achieves a -10.78% return, which is significantly lower than GFF's 17.55% return. Over the past 10 years, AMWD has underperformed GFF with an annualized return of -5.15%, while GFF has yielded a comparatively higher 21.55% annualized return.
AMWD
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 19.51%
- YTD
- -10.78%
- 6M
- -15.63%
- 1Y
- -12.48%
- 3Y*
- -9.15%
- 5Y*
- -11.16%
- 10Y*
- -5.15%
GFF
- 1D
- 1.48%
- 1M
- -2.70%
- YTD
- 17.55%
- 6M
- 16.10%
- 1Y
- 26.19%
- 3Y*
- 37.45%
- 5Y*
- 32.07%
- 10Y*
- 21.55%
AMWD vs. GFF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMWD American Woodmark Corporation | -10.78% | -32.23% | -14.35% | 90.03% | -25.06% | -30.53% | -10.20% | 87.70% | -57.25% | 73.09% |
GFF Griffon Corporation | 17.55% | 4.42% | 17.97% | 83.96% | 36.91% | 41.60% | 1.83% | 97.74% | -44.92% | -21.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMWD and GFF is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 22, 1986 | 0.29 |
Over the past year, AMWD and GFF have become more correlated (0.65) than their long-term average of 0.29, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
AMWD:
$700.63M
GFF:
$3.94B
AMWD:
$1.20
GFF:
$0.76
AMWD:
39.99
GFF:
114.02
AMWD:
2.84
GFF:
1.48
AMWD:
0.46
GFF:
1.69
AMWD:
0.78
GFF:
41.67
AMWD:
$1.52B
GFF:
$2.35B
AMWD:
$233.35M
GFF:
$1.00B
AMWD:
$101.63M
GFF:
$245.38M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMWD vs. GFF — Risk / Return Rank
AMWD
GFF
AMWD vs. GFF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Woodmark Corporation (AMWD) and Griffon Corporation (GFF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AMWD | GFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.15 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.30 | 0.94 | -1.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.64 | 2.48 | -3.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AMWD | GFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.29 | 0.74 | -1.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.26 | 0.78 | -1.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.11 | 0.48 | -0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.10 | 0.04 | +0.06 |
Drawdowns
AMWD vs. GFF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMWD drawdown since its inception was -84.09%, smaller than the maximum GFF drawdown of -96.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMWD and GFF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMWD | GFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.09% | -96.84% | +12.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -50.83% | -27.85% | -22.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -66.74% | -27.85% | -38.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -66.74% | -39.02% | -27.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -75.55% | -61.32% | -14.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -65.66% | -8.71% | -56.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -39.72% | -55.50% | +15.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 23.52% | 10.58% | +12.94% |
Volatility
AMWD vs. GFF - Volatility Comparison
American Woodmark Corporation (AMWD) has a higher volatility of 23.78% compared to Griffon Corporation (GFF) at 11.69%. This indicates that AMWD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GFF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMWD | GFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 23.78% | 11.69% | +12.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.09% | 24.84% | +13.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.79% | 35.41% | +16.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.97% | 41.11% | +1.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 48.08% | 45.31% | +2.77% |
Dividends
AMWD vs. GFF - Dividend Comparison
AMWD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GFF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMWD American Woodmark Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GFF Griffon Corporation | 0.98% | 1.03% | 0.88% | 4.10% | 6.62% | 1.16% | 1.50% | 1.44% | 12.27% | 1.23% | 0.80% | 0.96% |
Financials
AMWD vs. GFF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between American Woodmark Corporation and Griffon Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
AMWD vs. GFF - Profitability Comparison
AMWD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, American Woodmark Corporation reported a gross profit of 37.75M and revenue of 324.30M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 11.6%.
GFF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Griffon Corporation reported a gross profit of 191.99M and revenue of 421.86M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 45.5%.
AMWD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, American Woodmark Corporation reported an operating income of -34.00M and revenue of 324.30M, resulting in an operating margin of -10.5%.
GFF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Griffon Corporation reported an operating income of 87.35M and revenue of 421.86M, resulting in an operating margin of 20.7%.
AMWD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, American Woodmark Corporation reported a net income of -28.72M and revenue of 324.30M, resulting in a net margin of -8.9%.
GFF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Griffon Corporation reported a net income of 46.94M and revenue of 421.86M, resulting in a net margin of 11.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
AMWD and GFF have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AMWD has higher volatility (23.78%) compared to GFF (11.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMWD dropped -84.09% vs GFF's -96.84%.
GFF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.74 vs -0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AMWD and GFF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer