AMTR vs. XLG
Compare and contrast key facts about ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Total Return Index ETN (AMTR) and Invesco S&P 500® Top 50 ETF (XLG).
AMTR and XLG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AMTR is a passively managed fund by UBS that tracks the performance of the Alerian Midstream Energy Index. It was launched on Oct 20, 2020. XLG is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Russell Top 50 Index. It was launched on May 10, 2005. Both AMTR and XLG are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: AMTR or XLG.
Key characteristics
| AMTR | XLG | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 8.65% | 8.77% |
| 1Y Return | 23.18% | 31.87% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 16.19% | 10.47% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.65 | 2.30 |
| Daily Std Dev | 13.47% | 13.49% |
| Max Drawdown | -19.33% | -52.38% |
| Current Drawdown | -1.79% | -3.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMTR and XLG is 0.40, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
AMTR vs. XLG - Performance Comparison
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with AMTR having a 8.65% return and XLG slightly higher at 8.77%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AMTR vs. XLG - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMTR has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than XLG's 0.20% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
AMTR vs. XLG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Total Return Index ETN (AMTR) and Invesco S&P 500® Top 50 ETF (XLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
AMTR vs. XLG - Dividend Comparison
AMTR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMTR ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Total Return Index ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLG Invesco S&P 500® Top 50 ETF | 0.88% | 0.97% | 1.34% | 0.93% | 1.25% | 1.58% | 2.00% | 1.86% | 1.99% | 2.09% | 1.97% | 1.98% |
Drawdowns
AMTR vs. XLG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMTR drawdown since its inception was -19.33%, smaller than the maximum XLG drawdown of -52.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMTR and XLG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
AMTR vs. XLG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Total Return Index ETN (AMTR) is 4.17%, while Invesco S&P 500® Top 50 ETF (XLG) has a volatility of 4.87%. This indicates that AMTR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.