PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMTR vs. XLG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AMTR vs. XLG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Total Return Index ETN (AMTR) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


AMTR

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XLG

1D
-1.15%
1M
4.22%
YTD
7.57%
6M
7.32%
1Y
28.54%
3Y*
24.46%
5Y*
16.24%
10Y*
17.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMTR vs. XLG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
AMTR
ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Total Return Index ETN
0.00%0.00%44.68%12.75%20.41%36.99%15.24%
XLG
Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF
7.57%19.51%33.49%38.16%-24.29%30.77%7.69%

Correlation

The correlation between AMTR and XLG is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 22, 2020

0.32

The correlation between AMTR and XLG shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (3 years) to 0.33 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

AMTR vs. XLG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AMTR
XLG

Basic Materials

0.0%
0.6%

Communication Services

0.0%
17.1%

Consumer Cyclical

0.0%
11.3%

Consumer Defensive

0.0%
5.8%

Energy

0.0%
2.7%

Financial Services

0.0%
9.6%

Healthcare

0.0%
7.0%

Industrials

0.0%
1.9%

Real Estate

0.0%

-

Technology

0.0%
43.9%

Utilities

0.0%

-

Basic Materials

AMTR
0.0%
XLG
0.6%

Communication Services

AMTR
0.0%
XLG
17.1%

Consumer Cyclical

AMTR
0.0%
XLG
11.3%

Consumer Defensive

AMTR
0.0%
XLG
5.8%

Energy

AMTR
0.0%
XLG
2.7%

Financial Services

AMTR
0.0%
XLG
9.6%

Healthcare

AMTR
0.0%
XLG
7.0%

Industrials

AMTR
0.0%
XLG
1.9%

Real Estate

AMTR
0.0%
XLG

-

Technology

AMTR
0.0%
XLG
43.9%

Utilities

AMTR
0.0%
XLG

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMTR vs. XLG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMTR

XLG
XLG Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
XLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLG Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
XLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLG Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMTR vs. XLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Total Return Index ETN (AMTR) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

AMTR vs. XLG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AMTRXLGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

Drawdowns

AMTR vs. XLG - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMTRXLGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.30%

Volatility

AMTR vs. XLG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMTRXLGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.84%

AMTR vs. XLG - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMTR has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than XLG's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

AMTR vs. XLG - Dividend Comparison

AMTR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMTR
ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Total Return Index ETN
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XLG
Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF
0.60%0.64%0.72%0.97%1.34%0.94%1.25%1.58%2.00%1.85%2.00%2.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


AMTR and XLG have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XLG is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XLG is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for AMTR.

XLG has the higher dividend yield at 0.60%, compared with 0.00% for AMTR.

AMTR is categorized as MLPs, while XLG is S&P 500. AMTR tracks Alerian Midstream Energy Index, while XLG tracks S&P 500 Top 50 Index. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for AMTR and 0.20% for XLG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMTR and XLG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer