PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
AMTR vs. XLG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between AMTR and XLG is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.4

Performance

AMTR vs. XLG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Total Return Index ETN (AMTR) and Invesco S&P 500® Top 50 ETF (XLG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

100.00%150.00%200.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
210.13%
98.72%
AMTR
XLG

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

AMTR:

3.62

XLG:

2.42

Sortino Ratio

AMTR:

5.03

XLG:

3.13

Omega Ratio

AMTR:

1.67

XLG:

1.44

Calmar Ratio

AMTR:

9.35

XLG:

3.21

Martin Ratio

AMTR:

33.97

XLG:

13.23

Ulcer Index

AMTR:

1.44%

XLG:

2.75%

Daily Std Dev

AMTR:

13.51%

XLG:

15.05%

Max Drawdown

AMTR:

-19.33%

XLG:

-52.39%

Current Drawdown

AMTR:

-5.24%

XLG:

-1.96%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMTR achieves a 44.69% return, which is significantly higher than XLG's 34.91% return.


AMTR

YTD

44.69%

1M

-2.94%

6M

27.99%

1Y

44.98%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

XLG

YTD

34.91%

1M

2.97%

6M

11.04%

1Y

35.23%

5Y*

18.15%

10Y*

15.20%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


AMTR vs. XLG - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMTR has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than XLG's 0.20% expense ratio.


AMTR
ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Total Return Index ETN
Expense ratio chart for AMTR: current value at 0.75% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.75%
Expense ratio chart for XLG: current value at 0.20% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.20%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

AMTR vs. XLG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Total Return Index ETN (AMTR) and Invesco S&P 500® Top 50 ETF (XLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for AMTR, currently valued at 3.45, compared to the broader market0.002.004.003.452.42
The chart of Sortino ratio for AMTR, currently valued at 4.83, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.004.833.13
The chart of Omega ratio for AMTR, currently valued at 1.65, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.651.44
The chart of Calmar ratio for AMTR, currently valued at 8.82, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.008.823.21
The chart of Martin ratio for AMTR, currently valued at 27.98, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0027.9813.23
AMTR
XLG

The current AMTR Sharpe Ratio is 3.62, which is higher than the XLG Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMTR and XLG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.502.002.503.003.504.00JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
3.45
2.42
AMTR
XLG

Dividends

AMTR vs. XLG - Dividend Comparison

AMTR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
AMTR
ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Total Return Index ETN
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XLG
Invesco S&P 500® Top 50 ETF
0.53%0.97%1.34%0.94%1.25%1.58%2.00%1.85%2.00%2.09%1.97%1.97%

Drawdowns

AMTR vs. XLG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMTR drawdown since its inception was -19.33%, smaller than the maximum XLG drawdown of -52.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMTR and XLG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-5.24%
-1.96%
AMTR
XLG

Volatility

AMTR vs. XLG - Volatility Comparison

ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Total Return Index ETN (AMTR) has a higher volatility of 5.29% compared to Invesco S&P 500® Top 50 ETF (XLG) at 4.11%. This indicates that AMTR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
5.29%
4.11%
AMTR
XLG
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2024 PortfoliosLab