AMTR vs. XLG
AMTR (ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Total Return Index ETN) and XLG (Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AMTR is a MLPs fund tracking the Alerian Midstream Energy Index, while XLG is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Top 50 Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AMTR charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for XLG.
Performance
AMTR vs. XLG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
AMTR
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLG
- 1D
- -1.15%
- 1M
- 4.22%
- YTD
- 7.57%
- 6M
- 7.32%
- 1Y
- 28.54%
- 3Y*
- 24.46%
- 5Y*
- 16.24%
- 10Y*
- 17.27%
AMTR vs. XLG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMTR ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Total Return Index ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 44.68% | 12.75% | 20.41% | 36.99% | 15.24% |
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF | 7.57% | 19.51% | 33.49% | 38.16% | -24.29% | 30.77% | 7.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMTR and XLG is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 22, 2020 | 0.32 |
The correlation between AMTR and XLG shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (3 years) to 0.33 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
AMTR vs. XLG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AMTR
XLG
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Financial Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Real Estate
-
Technology
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
AMTR
XLG
Communication Services
AMTR
XLG
Consumer Cyclical
AMTR
XLG
Consumer Defensive
AMTR
XLG
Energy
AMTR
XLG
Financial Services
AMTR
XLG
Healthcare
AMTR
XLG
Industrials
AMTR
XLG
Real Estate
AMTR
XLG
-
Technology
AMTR
XLG
Utilities
AMTR
XLG
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMTR vs. XLG — Risk / Return Rank
AMTR
XLG
AMTR vs. XLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Total Return Index ETN (AMTR) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AMTR | XLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.15 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.87 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.92 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.62 | — |
Drawdowns
AMTR vs. XLG - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMTR | XLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -52.39% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -12.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -20.70% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -28.02% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -30.46% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -1.44% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -7.64% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.30% | — |
Volatility
AMTR vs. XLG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMTR | XLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.19% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.80% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 13.33% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 18.68% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 18.84% | — |
AMTR vs. XLG - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMTR has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than XLG's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
AMTR vs. XLG - Dividend Comparison
AMTR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMTR ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Total Return Index ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF | 0.60% | 0.64% | 0.72% | 0.97% | 1.34% | 0.94% | 1.25% | 1.58% | 2.00% | 1.85% | 2.00% | 2.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AMTR and XLG have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLG is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLG is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for AMTR.
XLG has the higher dividend yield at 0.60%, compared with 0.00% for AMTR.
AMTR is categorized as MLPs, while XLG is S&P 500. AMTR tracks Alerian Midstream Energy Index, while XLG tracks S&P 500 Top 50 Index. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for AMTR and 0.20% for XLG.
Find the right allocation for AMTR and XLG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer