AMT vs. PEP
Compare and contrast key facts about American Tower Corporation (AMT) and PepsiCo, Inc. (PEP).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: AMT or PEP.
Correlation
The correlation between AMT and PEP is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
AMT vs. PEP - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
AMT:
-0.38
PEP:
-0.35
AMT:
-0.37
PEP:
-0.39
AMT:
0.95
PEP:
0.95
AMT:
-0.24
PEP:
-0.33
AMT:
-0.85
PEP:
-0.96
AMT:
11.00%
PEP:
5.86%
AMT:
24.51%
PEP:
16.24%
AMT:
-98.70%
PEP:
-40.41%
AMT:
-33.14%
PEP:
-16.95%
Fundamentals
AMT:
$90.31B
PEP:
$214.22B
AMT:
$4.15
PEP:
$6.78
AMT:
46.57
PEP:
23.03
AMT:
1.20
PEP:
1.86
AMT:
$11.04B
PEP:
$91.92B
AMT:
$6.09B
PEP:
$50.43B
AMT:
$6.91B
PEP:
$16.26B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMT achieves a -12.25% return, which is significantly lower than PEP's -6.15% return. Over the past 10 years, AMT has outperformed PEP with an annualized return of 8.79%, while PEP has yielded a comparatively lower 8.05% annualized return.
AMT
-12.25%
-7.04%
-3.42%
-9.51%
-1.63%
8.79%
PEP
-6.15%
-1.63%
-5.73%
-5.09%
5.29%
8.05%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
AMT vs. PEP - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Tower Corporation (AMT) and PepsiCo, Inc. (PEP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
AMT vs. PEP - Dividend Comparison
AMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.55%, more than PEP's 3.45% yield.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
American Tower Corporation | 3.55% | 2.99% | 2.77% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 1.64% | 1.99% | 1.84% | 2.05% | 1.87% | 1.42% | 1.38% |
PepsiCo, Inc. | 3.45% | 2.91% | 2.50% | 2.45% | 2.71% | 2.77% | 3.25% | 2.64% | 2.83% | 2.76% | 2.68% | 2.70% |
Drawdowns
AMT vs. PEP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMT drawdown since its inception was -98.70%, which is greater than PEP's maximum drawdown of -40.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMT and PEP. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
AMT vs. PEP - Volatility Comparison
American Tower Corporation (AMT) has a higher volatility of 7.38% compared to PepsiCo, Inc. (PEP) at 4.34%. This indicates that AMT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PEP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
AMT vs. PEP - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between American Tower Corporation and PepsiCo, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities