AMSC vs. STRL
Compare and contrast key facts about American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC) and Sterling Construction Company, Inc. (STRL).
Performance
AMSC vs. STRL - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
AMSC vs. STRL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMSC American Superconductor Corporation | 17.62% | 16.85% | 121.10% | 202.72% | -66.18% | -53.54% | 198.34% | -29.60% | 207.16% | -50.75% |
STRL Sterling Construction Company, Inc. | 32.99% | 81.79% | 91.57% | 168.08% | 24.71% | 41.32% | 32.17% | 29.29% | -33.11% | 92.43% |
Fundamentals
AMSC:
$1.52B
STRL:
$12.69B
AMSC:
$3.04
STRL:
$9.37
AMSC:
11.15
STRL:
43.46
AMSC:
5.21
STRL:
5.06
AMSC:
2.83
STRL:
11.45
AMSC:
$279.40M
STRL:
$2.49B
AMSC:
$85.47M
STRL:
$572.31M
AMSC:
$20.09M
STRL:
$479.85M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMSC achieves a 17.62% return, which is significantly lower than STRL's 32.99% return. Over the past 10 years, AMSC has underperformed STRL with an annualized return of 15.42%, while STRL has yielded a comparatively higher 54.90% annualized return.
AMSC
- 1D
- 5.09%
- 1M
- 3.90%
- YTD
- 17.62%
- 6M
- -43.00%
- 1Y
- 86.60%
- 3Y*
- 90.32%
- 5Y*
- 11.90%
- 10Y*
- 15.42%
STRL
- 1D
- 6.46%
- 1M
- -4.87%
- YTD
- 32.99%
- 6M
- 19.90%
- 1Y
- 259.75%
- 3Y*
- 120.71%
- 5Y*
- 77.46%
- 10Y*
- 54.90%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMSC vs. STRL — Risk / Return Rank
AMSC
STRL
AMSC vs. STRL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC) and Sterling Construction Company, Inc. (STRL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AMSC | STRL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.05 | 4.39 | -3.34 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.69 | 3.82 | -2.13 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.52 | -0.27 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.31 | 8.08 | -6.77 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.40 | 23.59 | -21.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AMSC | STRL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.05 | 4.39 | -3.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 | 1.54 | -1.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.20 | 1.09 | -0.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.05 | 0.23 | -0.28 |
Correlation
The correlation between AMSC and STRL is 0.22, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
AMSC vs. STRL - Dividend Comparison
Neither AMSC nor STRL has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
AMSC vs. STRL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMSC drawdown since its inception was -99.57%, which is greater than STRL's maximum drawdown of -92.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMSC and STRL.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMSC | STRL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.57% | -92.51% | -7.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -61.08% | -31.02% | -30.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -82.94% | -47.67% | -35.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -89.06% | -59.60% | -29.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -95.11% | -11.41% | -83.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -75.66% | -46.56% | -29.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 33.43% | 10.62% | +22.81% |
Volatility
AMSC vs. STRL - Volatility Comparison
American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC) has a higher volatility of 22.49% compared to Sterling Construction Company, Inc. (STRL) at 21.20%. This indicates that AMSC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than STRL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AMSC | STRL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.49% | 21.20% | +1.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 69.27% | 46.74% | +22.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 83.04% | 59.69% | +23.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 88.39% | 50.46% | +37.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 78.69% | 50.44% | +28.25% |
Financials
AMSC vs. STRL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between American Superconductor Corporation and Sterling Construction Company, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities