AMS vs. HTGC
AMS (American Shared Hospital Services) and HTGC (Hercules Capital, Inc.) are both stocks. AMS operates in Medical Care Facilities (Healthcare), while HTGC operates in Mortgage Finance (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, AMS returned -3.85%/yr vs 13.52%/yr for HTGC. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
AMS vs. HTGC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMS achieves a -36.02% return, which is significantly lower than HTGC's -12.68% return. Over the past 10 years, AMS has underperformed HTGC with an annualized return of -3.85%, while HTGC has yielded a comparatively higher 13.52% annualized return.
AMS
- 1D
- -6.90%
- 1M
- -20.59%
- YTD
- -36.02%
- 6M
- -34.78%
- 1Y
- -43.51%
- 3Y*
- -22.14%
- 5Y*
- -15.21%
- 10Y*
- -3.85%
HTGC
- 1D
- -1.08%
- 1M
- -2.32%
- YTD
- -12.68%
- 6M
- -10.54%
- 1Y
- -1.58%
- 3Y*
- 13.19%
- 5Y*
- 9.47%
- 10Y*
- 13.52%
AMS vs. HTGC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMS American Shared Hospital Services | -36.02% | -33.86% | 34.07% | -18.79% | 23.63% | 6.76% | -9.02% | 2.52% | -8.46% | -22.39% |
HTGC Hercules Capital, Inc. | -12.68% | 3.54% | 33.33% | 42.91% | -10.42% | 26.50% | 14.49% | 39.86% | -6.86% | 1.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMS and HTGC is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2005 | 0.05 |
Fundamentals
AMS:
$9.02M
HTGC:
$3.05B
AMS:
-$0.23
HTGC:
$1.49
AMS:
0.32
HTGC:
5.21
AMS:
0.00
HTGC:
1.37
AMS:
$28.08M
HTGC:
$578.18M
AMS:
$5.06M
HTGC:
$510.74M
AMS:
$4.05B
HTGC:
$380.44M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMS vs. HTGC — Risk / Return Rank
AMS
HTGC
AMS vs. HTGC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Shared Hospital Services (AMS) and Hercules Capital, Inc. (HTGC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AMS | HTGC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.72 | -0.07 | -0.65 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.94 | 0.06 | -1.00 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 1.01 | -0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.76 | -0.08 | -0.69 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.46 | -0.18 | -1.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AMS | HTGC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.72 | -0.07 | -0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.33 | 0.37 | -0.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.06 | 0.49 | -0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.04 | 0.36 | -0.39 |
Drawdowns
AMS vs. HTGC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMS drawdown since its inception was -98.40%, which is greater than HTGC's maximum drawdown of -68.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMS and HTGC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMS | HTGC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.40% | -68.21% | -30.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -57.57% | -24.74% | -32.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -64.17% | -27.97% | -36.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -65.04% | -36.11% | -28.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -73.26% | -57.54% | -15.72% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -85.55% | -17.44% | -68.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -67.44% | -10.86% | -56.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 30.23% | 10.67% | +19.56% |
Volatility
AMS vs. HTGC - Volatility Comparison
American Shared Hospital Services (AMS) has a higher volatility of 29.59% compared to Hercules Capital, Inc. (HTGC) at 5.02%. This indicates that AMS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HTGC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMS | HTGC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 29.59% | 5.02% | +24.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 48.63% | 19.92% | +28.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 60.82% | 23.06% | +37.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.18% | 25.71% | +20.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 59.93% | 27.83% | +32.10% |
Dividends
AMS vs. HTGC - Dividend Comparison
AMS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HTGC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.66%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMS American Shared Hospital Services | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HTGC Hercules Capital, Inc. | 11.66% | 9.99% | 9.56% | 11.40% | 13.77% | 9.76% | 9.02% | 9.49% | 11.40% | 9.45% | 8.79% | 10.17% |
Financials
AMS vs. HTGC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between American Shared Hospital Services and Hercules Capital, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
AMS vs. HTGC - Profitability Comparison
AMS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, American Shared Hospital Services reported a gross profit of 906.00K and revenue of 7.73M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 11.7%.
HTGC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hercules Capital, Inc. reported a gross profit of 106.20M and revenue of 123.49M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 86.0%.
AMS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, American Shared Hospital Services reported an operating income of -219.00K and revenue of 7.73M, resulting in an operating margin of -2.8%.
HTGC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hercules Capital, Inc. reported an operating income of 65.43M and revenue of 123.49M, resulting in an operating margin of 53.0%.
AMS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, American Shared Hospital Services reported a net income of -631.00K and revenue of 7.73M, resulting in a net margin of -8.2%.
HTGC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hercules Capital, Inc. reported a net income of 0.00 and revenue of 123.49M, resulting in a net margin of 0.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
AMS and HTGC have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AMS has higher volatility (29.59%) compared to HTGC (5.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMS dropped -98.40% vs HTGC's -68.21%.
HTGC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.07 vs -0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AMS and HTGC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer