PortfoliosLab logo
AMS.MC vs. ODFL
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between AMS.MC and ODFL is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

AMS.MC vs. ODFL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amadeus IT Group S.A (AMS.MC) and Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. (ODFL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%1,000.00%2,000.00%3,000.00%4,000.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
502.78%
2,929.88%
AMS.MC
ODFL

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

AMS.MC:

0.47

ODFL:

-0.31

Sortino Ratio

AMS.MC:

0.63

ODFL:

-0.16

Omega Ratio

AMS.MC:

1.09

ODFL:

0.98

Calmar Ratio

AMS.MC:

0.30

ODFL:

-0.29

Martin Ratio

AMS.MC:

1.33

ODFL:

-0.64

Ulcer Index

AMS.MC:

6.39%

ODFL:

16.64%

Daily Std Dev

AMS.MC:

23.76%

ODFL:

37.31%

Max Drawdown

AMS.MC:

-55.98%

ODFL:

-66.29%

Current Drawdown

AMS.MC:

-12.80%

ODFL:

-30.74%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AMS.MC:

€30.42B

ODFL:

$33.52B

EPS

AMS.MC:

€2.79

ODFL:

$5.32

PE Ratio

AMS.MC:

25.20

ODFL:

29.70

PEG Ratio

AMS.MC:

1.63

ODFL:

2.94

PS Ratio

AMS.MC:

4.95

ODFL:

5.78

PB Ratio

AMS.MC:

6.02

ODFL:

7.91

Total Revenue (TTM)

AMS.MC:

€4.65B

ODFL:

$5.73B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AMS.MC:

€2.45B

ODFL:

$1.95B

EBITDA (TTM)

AMS.MC:

€1.78B

ODFL:

$1.76B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMS.MC achieves a -0.82% return, which is significantly higher than ODFL's -9.08% return. Over the past 10 years, AMS.MC has underperformed ODFL with an annualized return of 6.40%, while ODFL has yielded a comparatively higher 21.37% annualized return.


AMS.MC

YTD

-0.82%

1M

2.47%

6M

-0.11%

1Y

11.23%

5Y*

11.20%

10Y*

6.40%

ODFL

YTD

-9.08%

1M

7.94%

6M

-27.97%

1Y

-11.38%

5Y*

16.49%

10Y*

21.37%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

AMS.MC vs. ODFL — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMS.MC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of AMS.MC is 6363
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of AMS.MC is 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of AMS.MC is 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of AMS.MC is 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of AMS.MC is 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of AMS.MC is 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

ODFL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ODFL is 3535
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ODFL is 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ODFL is 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ODFL is 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ODFL is 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ODFL is 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

AMS.MC vs. ODFL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amadeus IT Group S.A (AMS.MC) and Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. (ODFL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current AMS.MC Sharpe Ratio is 0.47, which is higher than the ODFL Sharpe Ratio of -0.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMS.MC and ODFL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.501.001.50December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
0.63
-0.30
AMS.MC
ODFL

Dividends

AMS.MC vs. ODFL - Dividend Comparison

AMS.MC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.94%, more than ODFL's 0.66% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
AMS.MC
Amadeus IT Group S.A
1.94%1.82%1.14%0.00%0.00%0.94%1.61%1.87%1.56%1.80%1.72%1.89%
ODFL
Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc.
0.66%0.59%0.39%0.42%0.22%0.31%0.36%0.74%0.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

AMS.MC vs. ODFL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMS.MC drawdown since its inception was -55.98%, smaller than the maximum ODFL drawdown of -66.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMS.MC and ODFL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-16.24%
-30.74%
AMS.MC
ODFL

Volatility

AMS.MC vs. ODFL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amadeus IT Group S.A (AMS.MC) is 10.65%, while Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. (ODFL) has a volatility of 18.41%. This indicates that AMS.MC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ODFL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
10.65%
18.41%
AMS.MC
ODFL

Financials

AMS.MC vs. ODFL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Amadeus IT Group S.A and Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


500.00M1.00B1.50B20212022202320242025
1.54B
1.37B
(AMS.MC) Total Revenue
(ODFL) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. AMS.MC values in EUR, ODFL values in USD

AMS.MC vs. ODFL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Amadeus IT Group S.A and Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-40.0%-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%20212022202320242025
55.1%
31.5%
(AMS.MC) Gross Margin
(ODFL) Gross Margin
AMS.MC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Amadeus IT Group S.A reported a gross profit of 848.70M and revenue of 1.54B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.1%.

ODFL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. reported a gross profit of 432.61M and revenue of 1.37B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 31.5%.

AMS.MC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Amadeus IT Group S.A reported an operating income of 312.80M and revenue of 1.54B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.3%.

ODFL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. reported an operating income of 338.06M and revenue of 1.37B, resulting in an operating margin of 24.6%.

AMS.MC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Amadeus IT Group S.A reported a net income of 260.90M and revenue of 1.54B, resulting in a net margin of 16.9%.

ODFL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. reported a net income of 254.66M and revenue of 1.37B, resulting in a net margin of 18.5%.