PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
AMR vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

AMR vs. VOO

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

AMR (Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc.) is a stock, while VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) is S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Over the past 5 years, AMR returned 60.15%/yr vs 13.98%/yr for VOO. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

AMR vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. (AMR) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMR achieves a 7.67% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 11.34% return.

AMR

1D
1.14%
1M
14.16%
YTD
7.67%
6M
16.64%
1Y
93.66%
3Y*
14.91%
5Y*
60.15%
10Y*
—

VOO

1D
0.39%
1M
4.62%
YTD
11.34%
6M
11.27%
1Y
28.62%
3Y*
22.68%
5Y*
13.98%
10Y*
15.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMR vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AMR
Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc.		7.67%-0.12%-40.95%133.87%150.06%436.94%25.64%-86.23%10.71%-4.69%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF		11.34%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%15.89%

Correlation

The correlation between AMR and VOO is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2017

0.26

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc.

Vanguard S&P 500 ETF

Often compared with AMR:
AMR vs. HCCAMR vs. XMEAMR vs. MLMAMR vs. ANFAMR vs. TURAMR vs. SCCOAMR vs. NTNX
Often compared with VOO:
VOO vs. VTIVOO vs. QQQVOO vs. SCHDVOO vs. VTVOO vs. SPYVOO vs. FXAIXVOO vs. IVV

Return for Risk

AMR vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
AMR
AMR Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
AMR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMR Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
AMR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMR Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMR vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. (AMR) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

AMRVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.55
2.44

-0.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.31
3.31

-1.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.44

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.70

3.23

-0.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.06

15.03

-8.97

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AMR vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMR Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is lower than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMR and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

AMRVOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.55

2.44

-0.89

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.01

0.84

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.87

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

0.89

-0.68

Drawdowns

AMR vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMR drawdown since its inception was -97.35%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMR and VOO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

AMRVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.35%

-33.99%

-63.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.85%

-8.90%

-25.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-77.51%

-18.69%

-58.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-77.51%

-24.52%

-52.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-33.99%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-51.33%

-0.32%

-51.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-40.34%

-3.69%

-36.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.51%

1.91%

+13.60%

Volatility

AMR vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. (AMR) has a higher volatility of 19.30% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 2.78%. This indicates that AMR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

AMRVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.30%

2.78%

+16.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

40.42%

8.90%

+31.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

60.76%

11.80%

+48.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

59.88%

16.81%

+43.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

73.71%

18.00%

+55.71%

Dividends

AMR vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

AMR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMR
Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc.		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.57%4.23%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF		1.02%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions

AMR and VOO have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMR has higher volatility (19.30%) compared to VOO (2.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMR dropped -97.35% vs VOO's -33.99%.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMR and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer