AMR vs. ANET

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. (AMR) and Arista Networks, Inc. (ANET).

Performance

AMR vs. ANET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. (AMR) and Arista Networks, Inc. (ANET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

AMR vs. ANET - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AMR Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc.	-0.78%	-0.12%	-40.95%	133.87%	150.06%	436.94%	25.64%	-86.23%	10.71%	-4.69%
ANET Arista Networks, Inc.	-4.72%	18.55%	87.73%	94.07%	-15.58%	97.89%	42.86%	-3.46%	-10.56%	78.78%

Fundamentals

Market Cap AMR : $2.55B ANET : $159.28B
EPS AMR : -$4.75K ANET : $2.76
PS Ratio AMR : 0.00 ANET : 17.67
PB Ratio AMR : 0.00 ANET : 12.88
Total Revenue (TTM) AMR : $522.08B ANET : $9.01B
Gross Profit (TTM) AMR : $20.63M ANET : $5.77B
EBITDA (TTM) AMR : $819.35M ANET : $4.10B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMR achieves a -0.78% return, which is significantly higher than ANET's -4.72% return.

AMR

• 1D: -3.38%
• 1M: 20.07%
• YTD: -0.78%
• 6M: 14.14%
• 1Y: 54.76%
• 3Y*: 8.60%
• 5Y*: 74.78%
• 10Y*: —

ANET

• 1D: 1.69%
• 1M: -3.44%
• YTD: -4.72%
• 6M: -16.36%
• 1Y: 59.06%
• 3Y*: 43.82%
• 5Y*: 45.34%
• 10Y*: 41.49%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

AMR vs. ANET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMR

AMR Risk / Return Rank: 70
AMR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
AMR Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
AMR Omega Ratio Rank: 64
AMR Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
AMR Martin Ratio Rank: 73

ANET

ANET Risk / Return Rank: 74
ANET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
ANET Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
ANET Omega Ratio Rank: 69
ANET Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
ANET Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMR vs. ANET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. (AMR) and Arista Networks, Inc. (ANET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AMR	ANET	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.92	1.10	-0.19
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.66	1.70	-0.04
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.22	-0.03
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.67	2.16	-0.48
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.34	4.77	-0.43
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AMR vs. ANET - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMR Sharpe Ratio is 0.92, which is comparable to the ANET Sharpe Ratio of 1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMR and ANET, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AMR	ANET	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92	1.10	-0.19
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.24	0.99	+0.25
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.94	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.19	0.79	-0.59

Correlation

The correlation between AMR and ANET is 0.14, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

AMR vs. ANET - Dividend Comparison

Neither AMR nor ANET has paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
AMR Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.57%	4.23%
ANET Arista Networks, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

AMR vs. ANET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMR drawdown since its inception was -97.35%, which is greater than ANET's maximum drawdown of -52.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMR and ANET.

Drawdown Indicators

	AMR	ANET	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-97.35%	-52.20%	-45.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-34.85%	-28.33%	-6.52%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-77.51%	-50.42%	-27.09%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-52.20%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-55.15%	-22.95%	-32.20%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-40.03%	-15.48%	-24.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.44%	12.82%	+0.62%

Volatility

AMR vs. ANET - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. (AMR) is 17.11%, while Arista Networks, Inc. (ANET) has a volatility of 18.49%. This indicates that AMR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ANET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AMR	ANET	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.11%	18.49%	-1.38%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	38.56%	36.69%	+1.87%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	60.13%	53.90%	+6.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	60.42%	45.96%	+14.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	73.94%	44.40%	+29.54%

Financials

AMR vs. ANET - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

AMR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 520.47B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

ANET - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Arista Networks, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.56B and revenue of 2.49B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 62.9%.

AMR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. reported an operating income of 43.96M and revenue of 520.47B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

ANET - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Arista Networks, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.03B and revenue of 2.49B, resulting in an operating margin of 41.5%.

AMR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. reported a net income of -61.64B and revenue of 520.47B, resulting in a net margin of -11.8%.

ANET - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Arista Networks, Inc. reported a net income of 955.80M and revenue of 2.49B, resulting in a net margin of 38.4%.