PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMPCX vs. SCHG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AMPCX vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds AMCAP Fund Class C (AMPCX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMPCX achieves a 6.02% return, which is significantly lower than SCHG's 6.42% return. Over the past 10 years, AMPCX has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 11.76%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.77% annualized return.


AMPCX

1D
-0.77%
1M
3.76%
YTD
6.02%
6M
5.58%
1Y
20.92%
3Y*
18.91%
5Y*
9.13%
10Y*
11.76%

SCHG

1D
-1.23%
1M
4.81%
YTD
6.42%
6M
5.81%
1Y
24.64%
3Y*
25.02%
5Y*
15.59%
10Y*
18.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMPCX vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AMPCX
American Funds AMCAP Fund Class C
6.02%16.78%20.17%30.08%-29.17%22.77%20.52%25.37%-5.50%21.11%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
6.42%17.50%34.95%50.10%-31.80%28.11%39.14%36.02%-1.36%28.05%

Correlation

The correlation between AMPCX and SCHG is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2009

0.95

The correlation between AMPCX and SCHG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMPCX vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMPCX
AMPCX Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
AMPCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMPCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMPCX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
AMPCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMPCX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHG
SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMPCX vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds AMCAP Fund Class C (AMPCX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AMPCXSCHGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.28

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.52

1.51

+0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.14

5.04

+1.10

AMPCX vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMPCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is comparable to the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMPCX and SCHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AMPCXSCHGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.50

1.60

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

0.70

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

0.87

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.84

-0.41

Drawdowns

AMPCX vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMPCX drawdown since its inception was -53.38%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMPCX and SCHG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMPCXSCHGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.38%

-34.59%

-18.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.33%

-16.41%

+2.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.81%

-23.39%

+3.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.67%

-34.59%

-1.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.67%

-34.59%

-1.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.77%

-1.78%

+1.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.22%

-5.20%

-4.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.54%

4.90%

-1.36%

Volatility

AMPCX vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

American Funds AMCAP Fund Class C (AMPCX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) have volatilities of 3.58% and 3.61%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMPCXSCHGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.58%

3.61%

-0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.41%

11.62%

-0.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.56%

15.50%

-0.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.25%

22.27%

-3.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.73%

21.55%

-2.82%

AMPCX vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMPCX has a 1.40% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

AMPCX vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

AMPCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.71%, more than SCHG's 0.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMPCX
American Funds AMCAP Fund Class C
10.71%11.35%9.83%3.32%9.21%7.09%4.32%5.06%8.25%5.61%3.77%9.83%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
0.36%0.36%0.39%0.46%0.55%0.42%0.52%0.82%1.27%1.01%1.04%1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, AMPCX and SCHG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SCHG has higher volatility (3.61%) compared to AMPCX (3.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMPCX dropped -53.38% vs SCHG's -34.59%.

SCHG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMPCX and SCHG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer