AMND vs. MLPR
Compare and contrast key facts about ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy High Dividend Index ETN due July 19, 2050 (AMND) and ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN (MLPR).
AMND and MLPR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AMND is a passively managed fund by UBS that tracks the performance of the Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend Index. It was launched on Jul 15, 2020. MLPR is a passively managed fund by UBS that tracks the performance of the Alerian MLP Index (150%). It was launched on Jun 2, 2020. Both AMND and MLPR are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: AMND or MLPR.
Key characteristics
| AMND | MLPR | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 36.82% | 27.98% |
| 1Y Return | 40.56% | 30.82% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 21.17% | 32.01% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 3.54 | 1.56 |
| Sortino Ratio | 5.04 | 2.16 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.63 | 1.27 |
| Calmar Ratio | 7.38 | 2.65 |
| Martin Ratio | 28.05 | 8.09 |
| Ulcer Index | 1.50% | 4.09% |
| Daily Std Dev | 11.89% | 21.17% |
| Max Drawdown | -18.21% | -48.98% |
| Current Drawdown | -0.88% | -1.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMND and MLPR is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
AMND vs. MLPR - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, AMND achieves a 36.82% return, which is significantly higher than MLPR's 27.98% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AMND vs. MLPR - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMND has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than MLPR's 0.95% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
AMND vs. MLPR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy High Dividend Index ETN due July 19, 2050 (AMND) and ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN (MLPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
AMND vs. MLPR - Dividend Comparison
AMND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.28%, less than MLPR's 9.84% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMND ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy High Dividend Index ETN due July 19, 2050 | 5.28% | 6.57% | 6.37% | 7.10% | 2.49% |
MLPR ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN | 9.84% | 10.08% | 10.07% | 10.69% | 4.21% |
Drawdowns
AMND vs. MLPR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMND drawdown since its inception was -18.21%, smaller than the maximum MLPR drawdown of -48.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMND and MLPR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
AMND vs. MLPR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy High Dividend Index ETN due July 19, 2050 (AMND) is 3.68%, while ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN (MLPR) has a volatility of 8.33%. This indicates that AMND experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MLPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.