AMLP vs. TPYP
AMLP (Alerian MLP ETF) and TPYP (Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - AMLP is a MLPs fund tracking the Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index, while TPYP is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Tortoise North American Pipeline Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, AMLP returned 6.79%/yr vs 11.93%/yr for TPYP. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AMLP charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for TPYP.
Performance
AMLP vs. TPYP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMLP achieves a 16.62% return, which is significantly lower than TPYP's 20.11% return. Over the past 10 years, AMLP has underperformed TPYP with an annualized return of 6.79%, while TPYP has yielded a comparatively higher 11.93% annualized return.
AMLP
- 1D
- 1.03%
- 1M
- 0.25%
- YTD
- 16.62%
- 6M
- 16.20%
- 1Y
- 19.16%
- 3Y*
- 20.25%
- 5Y*
- 17.03%
- 10Y*
- 6.79%
TPYP
- 1D
- 1.72%
- 1M
- -2.24%
- YTD
- 20.11%
- 6M
- 20.30%
- 1Y
- 22.00%
- 3Y*
- 25.03%
- 5Y*
- 17.97%
- 10Y*
- 11.93%
AMLP vs. TPYP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMLP Alerian MLP ETF | 16.62% | 5.78% | 22.76% | 21.40% | 25.47% | 39.09% | -32.26% | 5.99% | -12.67% | -7.89% |
TPYP Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund | 20.11% | 7.59% | 37.37% | 10.51% | 16.09% | 34.97% | -20.99% | 23.35% | -11.13% | 2.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMLP and TPYP is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2015 | 0.80 |
The correlation between AMLP and TPYP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
AMLP vs. TPYP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AMLP
TPYP
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Energy
AMLP
TPYP
Utilities
AMLP
TPYP
Basic Materials
AMLP
-
TPYP
Communication Services
AMLP
-
TPYP
-
Consumer Cyclical
AMLP
-
TPYP
-
Consumer Defensive
AMLP
-
TPYP
-
Financial Services
AMLP
-
TPYP
Healthcare
AMLP
-
TPYP
-
Industrials
AMLP
-
TPYP
-
Real Estate
AMLP
-
TPYP
-
Technology
AMLP
-
TPYP
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMLP vs. TPYP — Risk / Return Rank
AMLP
TPYP
AMLP vs. TPYP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP) and Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund (TPYP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AMLP | TPYP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.62 | 1.68 | -0.06 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.25 | 2.33 | -0.08 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.29 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.20 | 3.43 | -1.23 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.36 | 9.27 | -1.91 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AMLP | TPYP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.62 | 1.68 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 | 1.04 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 | 0.55 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | 0.43 | -0.20 |
Drawdowns
AMLP vs. TPYP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMLP drawdown since its inception was -77.19%, which is greater than TPYP's maximum drawdown of -51.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMLP and TPYP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMLP | TPYP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.19% | -51.91% | -25.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.94% | -6.84% | -2.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.27% | -13.17% | -1.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.92% | -17.96% | -2.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -72.62% | -51.91% | -20.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.85% | -5.24% | +1.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.40% | -7.89% | -9.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.67% | 2.53% | +0.14% |
Volatility
AMLP vs. TPYP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP) is 4.94%, while Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund (TPYP) has a volatility of 5.71%. This indicates that AMLP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TPYP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMLP | TPYP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.94% | 5.71% | -0.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.65% | 10.29% | -1.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.91% | 13.21% | -1.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.98% | 17.45% | +2.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.68% | 21.95% | +5.73% |
AMLP vs. TPYP - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMLP has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than TPYP's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
AMLP vs. TPYP - Dividend Comparison
AMLP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.62%, more than TPYP's 3.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMLP Alerian MLP ETF | 7.62% | 8.36% | 7.70% | 7.86% | 7.70% | 8.55% | 12.31% | 9.12% | 9.29% | 7.97% | 8.09% | 9.84% |
TPYP Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund | 3.25% | 3.91% | 3.95% | 4.83% | 4.48% | 4.86% | 6.14% | 4.45% | 4.58% | 3.71% | 3.49% | 2.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AMLP and TPYP have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TPYP has higher volatility (5.71%) compared to AMLP (4.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMLP dropped -77.19% vs TPYP's -51.91%.
On 10-year performance, TPYP leads with 11.93% vs 6.79% for AMLP. On fees, TPYP is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, AMLP has been the lower-risk option at 4.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, TPYP has performed better with a 11.93% return vs 6.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TPYP is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for AMLP.
AMLP has the higher dividend yield at 7.62%, compared with 3.25% for TPYP.
AMLP is categorized as MLPs, while TPYP is Energy Equities. AMLP tracks Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index, while TPYP tracks Tortoise North American Pipeline Index. They also come from different issuers: SS&C and Tortoise. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for AMLP and 0.40% for TPYP.
TPYP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs 1.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AMLP and TPYP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer