PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMLP vs. SCHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AMLP vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMLP achieves a 22.35% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 24.03% return. Over the past 10 years, AMLP has underperformed SCHD with an annualized return of 7.29%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively higher 12.76% annualized return.


AMLP

1D
0.89%
1M
6.26%
6M
14.99%
YTD
22.35%
1Y
21.27%
3Y*
19.27%
5Y*
19.50%
10Y*
7.29%
ALL TIME*
5.90%

SCHD

1D
0.18%
1M
3.33%
6M
14.09%
YTD
24.03%
1Y
31.54%
3Y*
14.19%
5Y*
9.54%
10Y*
12.76%
ALL TIME*
13.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$65.00M$60.75M$74.60M
$786.88M$715.86M$685.58M

AMLP vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AMLP
Alerian MLP ETF
22.35%5.78%22.76%21.40%25.47%39.09%-32.26%5.99%-12.67%-7.89%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
24.03%4.34%11.66%4.54%-3.26%29.87%15.03%27.29%-5.56%20.85%

Correlation

The correlation between AMLP and SCHD is 0.39, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.53

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2011

0.50

The correlation between AMLP and SCHD shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (1 year) to 0.53 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

AMLP vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AMLP
SCHD

Energy

98.1%
14.1%

Industrials

2.1%
7.8%

Utilities

1.9%
0.1%

Financial Services

0.0%
9.9%

Basic Materials

-

1.2%

Communication Services

-

6.2%

Consumer Cyclical

-

7.7%

Consumer Defensive

-

20.6%

Healthcare

-

20.8%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

12.7%

Energy

AMLP
98.1%
SCHD
14.1%

Industrials

AMLP
2.1%
SCHD
7.8%

Utilities

AMLP
1.9%
SCHD
0.1%

Financial Services

AMLP
0.0%
SCHD
9.9%

Basic Materials

AMLP

-

SCHD
1.2%

Communication Services

AMLP

-

SCHD
6.2%

Consumer Cyclical

AMLP

-

SCHD
7.7%

Consumer Defensive

AMLP

-

SCHD
20.6%

Healthcare

AMLP

-

SCHD
20.8%

Real Estate

AMLP

-

SCHD

-

Technology

AMLP

-

SCHD
12.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMLP vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AMLP
AMLP Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
AMLP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMLP Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMLP Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
AMLP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMLP Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHD
SCHD Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
SCHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHD Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHD Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AMLP vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AMLPSCHDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.51

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.35

6.74

-4.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.55

17.01

-10.46

AMLP vs. SCHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMLP Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is lower than the SCHD Sharpe Ratio of 2.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMLP and SCHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AMLP vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMLP drawdown since its inception was -77.19%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMLP and SCHD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMLPSCHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.19%

-33.37%

-43.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.47%

-4.61%

-3.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.27%

-16.13%

+1.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.92%

-16.85%

-4.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-72.62%

-33.37%

-39.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.24%

+1.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.26%

-3.30%

-13.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.20%

1.82%

+1.38%

Volatility

AMLP vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison

Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) have volatilities of 3.98% and 4.11%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMLPSCHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.98%

4.11%

-0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.81%

8.11%

+1.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.55%

11.13%

+1.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.37%

14.39%

+4.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.64%

16.72%

+10.92%

AMLP vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMLP has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

AMLP vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison

AMLP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.27%, more than SCHD's 3.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMLP
Alerian MLP ETF
7.27%8.36%7.70%7.86%7.70%8.55%12.31%9.12%9.29%7.97%8.09%9.84%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
3.13%3.82%3.64%3.49%3.39%2.78%3.16%2.98%3.06%2.63%2.89%2.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


AMLP and SCHD have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHD has higher volatility (4.11%) compared to AMLP (3.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMLP dropped -77.19% vs SCHD's -33.37%.

On 10-year performance, SCHD leads with 12.76% vs 7.29% for AMLP. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, AMLP has been the lower-risk option at 3.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SCHD has performed better with a 12.76% return vs 7.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for AMLP.

AMLP has the higher dividend yield at 7.27%, compared with 3.13% for SCHD.

AMLP is categorized as MLPs, while SCHD is Dividend. AMLP tracks Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index, while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: SS&C and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for AMLP and 0.06% for SCHD.

SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.81 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMLP and SCHD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer