AMLP vs. HIPS
Compare and contrast key facts about Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP) and GraniteShares HIPS US High Income ETF (HIPS).
AMLP and HIPS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AMLP is a passively managed fund by SS&C that tracks the performance of the Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index. It was launched on Aug 23, 2010. HIPS is a passively managed fund by GraniteShares that tracks the performance of the TFMS HIPS Index. It was launched on Jan 6, 2015. Both AMLP and HIPS are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: AMLP or HIPS.
Key characteristics
AMLP | HIPS | |
---|---|---|
YTD Return | 13.01% | 4.40% |
1Y Return | 36.24% | 24.12% |
3Y Return (Ann) | 24.90% | 5.37% |
5Y Return (Ann) | 7.98% | 3.66% |
Sharpe Ratio | 2.62 | 2.20 |
Daily Std Dev | 14.32% | 10.97% |
Max Drawdown | -77.19% | -53.34% |
Current Drawdown | -0.72% | -0.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMLP and HIPS is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
AMLP vs. HIPS - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, AMLP achieves a 13.01% return, which is significantly higher than HIPS's 4.40% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
AMLP vs. HIPS - Expense Ratio Comparison
Risk-Adjusted Performance
AMLP vs. HIPS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP) and GraniteShares HIPS US High Income ETF (HIPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Sharpe ratio | Sortino ratio | Omega ratio | Calmar ratio | Ulcer Index | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Alerian MLP ETF | 2.62 | ||||
GraniteShares HIPS US High Income ETF | 2.20 |
Dividends
AMLP vs. HIPS - Dividend Comparison
AMLP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.33%, less than HIPS's 11.00% yield.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Alerian MLP ETF | 7.33% | 7.86% | 7.70% | 8.55% | 12.31% | 9.12% | 9.29% | 7.97% | 8.09% | 9.84% | 6.45% | 6.00% |
GraniteShares HIPS US High Income ETF | 10.15% | 10.34% | 10.43% | 8.43% | 8.73% | 7.57% | 8.66% | 7.31% | 7.24% | 6.51% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
AMLP vs. HIPS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMLP drawdown since its inception was -77.19%, which is greater than HIPS's maximum drawdown of -53.34%. The drawdown chart below compares losses from any high point along the way for AMLP and HIPS
Volatility
AMLP vs. HIPS - Volatility Comparison
Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP) has a higher volatility of 3.16% compared to GraniteShares HIPS US High Income ETF (HIPS) at 1.88%. This indicates that AMLP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HIPS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.