AMKBY vs. QYLD

In the year-to-date period, AMKBY achieves a 26.95% return, which is significantly higher than QYLD's -8.09% return. Over the past 10 years, AMKBY has outperformed QYLD with an annualized return of 8.59%, while QYLD has yielded a comparatively lower -3.30% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AP Moeller-Maersk AS (AMKBY) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current AMKBY Sharpe Ratio is 0.65, which is higher than the QYLD Sharpe Ratio of -0.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMKBY and QYLD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

AMKBY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.65%, less than QYLD's 13.71% yield.

The maximum AMKBY drawdown since its inception was -62.69%, which is greater than QYLD's maximum drawdown of -40.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMKBY and QYLD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

AP Moeller-Maersk AS (AMKBY) has a higher volatility of 14.21% compared to Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) at 4.47%. This indicates that AMKBY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.