PortfoliosLab logo
AMEM.DE vs. MOAT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between AMEM.DE and MOAT is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

AMEM.DE vs. MOAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF EUR (AMEM.DE) and VanEck Vectors Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%100.00%200.00%300.00%400.00%500.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
47.51%
405.15%
AMEM.DE
MOAT

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

AMEM.DE:

0.20

MOAT:

0.09

Sortino Ratio

AMEM.DE:

0.39

MOAT:

0.31

Omega Ratio

AMEM.DE:

1.05

MOAT:

1.04

Calmar Ratio

AMEM.DE:

0.19

MOAT:

0.11

Martin Ratio

AMEM.DE:

0.66

MOAT:

0.39

Ulcer Index

AMEM.DE:

5.41%

MOAT:

5.88%

Daily Std Dev

AMEM.DE:

17.34%

MOAT:

18.29%

Max Drawdown

AMEM.DE:

-35.87%

MOAT:

-33.31%

Current Drawdown

AMEM.DE:

-8.05%

MOAT:

-10.13%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMEM.DE achieves a -1.31% return, which is significantly higher than MOAT's -5.60% return. Over the past 10 years, AMEM.DE has underperformed MOAT with an annualized return of 2.99%, while MOAT has yielded a comparatively higher 12.37% annualized return.


AMEM.DE

YTD

-1.31%

1M

9.33%

6M

-4.53%

1Y

3.50%

5Y*

5.93%

10Y*

2.99%

MOAT

YTD

-5.60%

1M

14.39%

6M

-8.37%

1Y

1.72%

5Y*

13.45%

10Y*

12.37%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


AMEM.DE vs. MOAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMEM.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than MOAT's 0.48% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

AMEM.DE vs. MOAT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMEM.DE
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of AMEM.DE is 3333
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of AMEM.DE is 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of AMEM.DE is 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of AMEM.DE is 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of AMEM.DE is 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of AMEM.DE is 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

MOAT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MOAT is 2828
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MOAT is 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MOAT is 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MOAT is 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MOAT is 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MOAT is 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

AMEM.DE vs. MOAT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF EUR (AMEM.DE) and VanEck Vectors Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current AMEM.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.20, which is higher than the MOAT Sharpe Ratio of 0.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMEM.DE and MOAT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
0.42
0.09
AMEM.DE
MOAT

Dividends

AMEM.DE vs. MOAT - Dividend Comparison

AMEM.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MOAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
AMEM.DE
Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF EUR
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MOAT
VanEck Vectors Morningstar Wide Moat ETF
1.45%1.37%0.86%1.25%1.08%1.46%1.31%1.79%1.07%1.17%2.13%1.34%

Drawdowns

AMEM.DE vs. MOAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMEM.DE drawdown since its inception was -35.87%, which is greater than MOAT's maximum drawdown of -33.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMEM.DE and MOAT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-14.57%
-10.13%
AMEM.DE
MOAT

Volatility

AMEM.DE vs. MOAT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF EUR (AMEM.DE) is 8.57%, while VanEck Vectors Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) has a volatility of 10.86%. This indicates that AMEM.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MOAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
8.57%
10.86%
AMEM.DE
MOAT