PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
AMDS vs. NVDA
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between AMDS and NVDA is -0.53. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


-0.50.00.51.0-0.5

Performance

AMDS vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 1x Short AMD Daily ETF (AMDS) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
25.98%
13.25%
AMDS
NVDA

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

AMDS:

0.65

NVDA:

1.64

Sortino Ratio

AMDS:

1.23

NVDA:

2.18

Omega Ratio

AMDS:

1.15

NVDA:

1.28

Calmar Ratio

AMDS:

0.52

NVDA:

3.44

Martin Ratio

AMDS:

2.39

NVDA:

9.53

Ulcer Index

AMDS:

12.78%

NVDA:

9.76%

Daily Std Dev

AMDS:

46.77%

NVDA:

56.59%

Max Drawdown

AMDS:

-59.04%

NVDA:

-89.73%

Current Drawdown

AMDS:

-33.31%

NVDA:

-6.24%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with AMDS having a 4.14% return and NVDA slightly higher at 4.33%.


AMDS

YTD

4.14%

1M

6.21%

6M

25.97%

1Y

23.38%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

NVDA

YTD

4.33%

1M

-0.51%

6M

13.25%

1Y

107.70%

5Y*

80.80%

10Y*

74.84%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

AMDS vs. NVDA — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMDS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of AMDS is 2727
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of AMDS is 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of AMDS is 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of AMDS is 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of AMDS is 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of AMDS is 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

NVDA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of NVDA is 8888
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of NVDA is 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of NVDA is 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of NVDA is 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of NVDA is 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of NVDA is 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

AMDS vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 1x Short AMD Daily ETF (AMDS) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for AMDS, currently valued at 0.65, compared to the broader market0.002.004.000.651.64
The chart of Sortino ratio for AMDS, currently valued at 1.23, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.001.232.18
The chart of Omega ratio for AMDS, currently valued at 1.15, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.151.28
The chart of Calmar ratio for AMDS, currently valued at 0.52, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.523.44
The chart of Martin ratio for AMDS, currently valued at 2.39, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.002.399.53
AMDS
NVDA

The current AMDS Sharpe Ratio is 0.65, which is lower than the NVDA Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMDS and NVDA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.004.005.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
0.65
1.64
AMDS
NVDA

Dividends

AMDS vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison

AMDS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
AMDS
GraniteShares 1x Short AMD Daily ETF
0.00%0.00%14.28%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
0.02%0.02%0.03%0.11%0.05%0.12%0.27%0.46%0.29%0.45%1.20%1.70%

Drawdowns

AMDS vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMDS drawdown since its inception was -59.04%, smaller than the maximum NVDA drawdown of -89.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMDS and NVDA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-33.31%
-6.24%
AMDS
NVDA

Volatility

AMDS vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GraniteShares 1x Short AMD Daily ETF (AMDS) is 10.36%, while NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) has a volatility of 24.11%. This indicates that AMDS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
10.36%
24.11%
AMDS
NVDA
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab