PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
AMDL vs. MSFL
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


AMDLMSFL
Daily Std Dev93.33%37.51%
Max Drawdown-61.70%-29.48%
Current Drawdown-47.00%-22.75%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.4

The correlation between AMDL and MSFL is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

AMDL vs. MSFL - Performance Comparison

The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%20.00%MayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctober
-47.00%
-8.41%
AMDL
MSFL

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


AMDL vs. MSFL - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both AMDL and MSFL have an expense ratio of 1.15%.


AMDL
GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF
Expense ratio chart for AMDL: current value at 1.15% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%1.15%
Expense ratio chart for MSFL: current value at 1.15% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%1.15%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

AMDL vs. MSFL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL) and GraniteShares 2x Long MSFT Daily ETF (MSFL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AMDL
Sharpe ratio
No data

AMDL vs. MSFL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Chart placeholderNot enough data

Dividends

AMDL vs. MSFL - Dividend Comparison

Neither AMDL nor MSFL has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

AMDL vs. MSFL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMDL drawdown since its inception was -61.70%, which is greater than MSFL's maximum drawdown of -29.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMDL and MSFL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%MayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctober
-47.00%
-22.75%
AMDL
MSFL

Volatility

AMDL vs. MSFL - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL) has a higher volatility of 21.35% compared to GraniteShares 2x Long MSFT Daily ETF (MSFL) at 7.49%. This indicates that AMDL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MSFL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%35.00%40.00%MayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctober
21.35%
7.49%
AMDL
MSFL