PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Portfolios
Screeners
Discussions
AMDL vs. MSFL
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

AMDL vs. MSFL

Last updated May 14, 2025

Compare and contrast key facts about GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL) and GraniteShares 2x Long MSFT Daily ETF (MSFL).

AMDL and MSFL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AMDL is an actively managed fund by GraniteShares. It was launched on Mar 15, 2024. MSFL is an actively managed fund by GraniteShares. It was launched on Mar 15, 2024.

Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: AMDL or MSFL.

Correlation

The correlation between AMDL and MSFL is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

AMDL vs. MSFL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL) and GraniteShares 2x Long MSFT Daily ETF (MSFL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

AMDL:

-0.59

MSFL:

0.05

Sortino Ratio

AMDL:

-0.60

MSFL:

0.46

Omega Ratio

AMDL:

0.93

MSFL:

1.06

Calmar Ratio

AMDL:

-0.71

MSFL:

0.07

Martin Ratio

AMDL:

-1.18

MSFL:

0.13

Ulcer Index

AMDL:

53.43%

MSFL:

23.98%

Daily Std Dev

AMDL:

105.86%

MSFL:

51.35%

Max Drawdown

AMDL:

-88.63%

MSFL:

-47.70%

Current Drawdown

AMDL:

-78.20%

MSFL:

-18.33%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMDL achieves a -27.42% return, which is significantly lower than MSFL's 6.50% return.

AMDL

YTD

-27.42%

1M

41.48%

6M

-50.27%

1Y

-61.92%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

MSFL

YTD

6.50%

1M

31.65%

6M

4.30%

1Y

2.62%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

AMDL vs. MSFL - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both AMDL and MSFL have an expense ratio of 1.15%.

AMDL
GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF
MSFL
GraniteShares 2x Long MSFT Daily ETF

Risk-Adjusted Performance

AMDL vs. MSFL — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
AMDL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of AMDL is 22
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of AMDL is 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of AMDL is 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of AMDL is 44
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of AMDL is 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of AMDL is 22
Martin Ratio Rank
MSFL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MSFL is 2020
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MSFL is 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MSFL is 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MSFL is 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MSFL is 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MSFL is 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

AMDL vs. MSFL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL) and GraniteShares 2x Long MSFT Daily ETF (MSFL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current AMDL Sharpe Ratio is -0.59, which is lower than the MSFL Sharpe Ratio of 0.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMDL and MSFL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading data...

Dividends

AMDL vs. MSFL - Dividend Comparison

Neither AMDL nor MSFL has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

AMDL vs. MSFL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMDL drawdown since its inception was -88.63%, which is greater than MSFL's maximum drawdown of -47.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMDL and MSFL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Loading data...

Volatility

AMDL vs. MSFL - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL) has a higher volatility of 25.64% compared to GraniteShares 2x Long MSFT Daily ETF (MSFL) at 19.97%. This indicates that AMDL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MSFL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading data...