AMDL vs. FNGU

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

AMDL (GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF) and FNGU (MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs) are both Leveraged Equities funds - AMDL tracks the Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (200%) while FNGU tracks the NYSE FANG+ Index (Gross Total Return) (300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, AMDL returned 337.66% vs 22.73% for FNGU. Their 0.55 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. AMDL charges 1.07%/yr vs 2.60%/yr for FNGU.

Performance

AMDL vs. FNGU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL) and MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs (FNGU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMDL achieves a 242.25% return, which is significantly higher than FNGU's 14.13% return.

AMDL

• 1D: 2.88%
• 1M: -18.31%
• 6M: 166.77%
• YTD: 242.25%
• 1Y: 337.66%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 36.27%

FNGU

• 1D: 8.14%
• 1M: 8.83%
• 6M: 28.02%
• YTD: 14.13%
• 1Y: 22.73%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 11.83%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AMDL GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF	$183.29M	$203.26M	$349.81M
FNGU MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs	$100.73M	$114.41M	$153.47M

AMDL vs. FNGU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AMDL GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF	242.25%	133.83%
FNGU MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs	14.13%	3.02%

Correlation

The correlation between AMDL and FNGU is 0.50, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.50
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2025	0.55

The correlation between AMDL and FNGU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.

AMDL vs. FNGU - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AMDL	FNGU
Technology	66.7%	60.6%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	29.8%
Consumer Cyclical	-	9.6%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

AMDL vs. FNGU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AMDL

AMDL Risk / Return Rank: 88
AMDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
AMDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
AMDL Omega Ratio Rank: 83
AMDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
AMDL Martin Ratio Rank: 82

FNGU

FNGU Risk / Return Rank: 21
FNGU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
FNGU Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
FNGU Omega Ratio Rank: 24
FNGU Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
FNGU Martin Ratio Rank: 17

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AMDL vs. FNGU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL) and MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs (FNGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AMDL	FNGU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.39	0.35	+2.04
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.95	0.92	+2.03
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.11	+0.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.06	0.38	+5.68
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.39	0.85	+10.53

AMDL vs. FNGU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMDL Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is higher than the FNGU Sharpe Ratio of 0.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMDL and FNGU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AMDL vs. FNGU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMDL drawdown since its inception was -88.63%, which is greater than FNGU's maximum drawdown of -61.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMDL and FNGU.

Drawdown Indicators

	AMDL	FNGU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-88.63%	-61.30%	-27.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-56.13%	-59.55%	+3.42%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-35.69%	-20.25%	-15.44%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-46.49%	-22.60%	-23.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	29.82%	26.71%	+3.11%

Volatility

AMDL vs. FNGU - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL) has a higher volatility of 47.95% compared to MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs (FNGU) at 19.48%. This indicates that AMDL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNGU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AMDL	FNGU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	47.95%	19.48%	+28.47%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	111.57%	54.28%	+57.29%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	142.56%	65.96%	+76.60%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	120.89%	79.84%	+41.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	120.89%	79.84%	+41.05%

AMDL vs. FNGU - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMDL has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is lower than FNGU's 2.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

AMDL vs. FNGU - Dividend Comparison

Neither AMDL nor FNGU has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AMDL and FNGU in my portfolio?

AMDL and FNGU have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AMDL or FNGU?

AMDL has higher volatility (47.95%) compared to FNGU (19.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMDL dropped -88.63% vs FNGU's -61.30%.

Which ETF is better, AMDL or FNGU?

On 1-year performance, AMDL leads with 337.66% vs 22.73% for FNGU. On fees, AMDL is cheaper at 1.07% per year. On volatility, FNGU has been the lower-risk option at 19.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AMDL or FNGU?

Over the 1-year period, AMDL has performed better with a 337.66% return vs 22.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AMDL or FNGU?

AMDL is cheaper with a 1.07% expense ratio, compared with 2.60% for FNGU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AMDL or FNGU?

AMDL and FNGU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between AMDL and FNGU?

AMDL tracks Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (200%), while FNGU tracks NYSE FANG+ Index (Gross Total Return) (300%). They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and BMO. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for AMDL and 2.60% for FNGU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AMDL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.